These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

134 related items for PubMed ID: 18396849

  • 1. [The handling of custodial criteria by expert evaluators and the expectations for solution-oriented evaluations from the perspective of Austrian family court judges].
    Bein N, Völkl-Kernstock S, Klicpera C, Friedrich MH.
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2008; 57(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 18396849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [On the work of Austrian authorised experts on procedures in custodial and visiting rights--a survey of current practice from the parents and children view].
    Vöelkl-Kernstock S, Bein N, Gutschner D, Klicpera C, Ponocny-Seliger E, Friedrich MH.
    Neuropsychiatr; 2008; 22(4):268-76. PubMed ID: 19080998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Procedures of Austrian authorised experts in custodial and visiting rights--a survey of current practice].
    Völkl-Kernstock S, Bein N, Klicpera C, Eichberger H, Friedrich MH.
    Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 2007 May; 35(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 17695772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Child psychiatric documentation in child visitation and custody disputes--results of a survey].
    Andritzky W.
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2003 Dec; 52(10):794-811. PubMed ID: 14699788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Psychological expert assessment as an intervention in child custody conflicts during divorce].
    Scheuerer-Englisch H, Suess GJ, Schwabe-Höllein M.
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 1994 Dec; 43(10):372-9. PubMed ID: 7870710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Aspects of family-oriented diagnosis in compulsory legal family expert assessment].
    Mladek G, Löffler M, Nickel P.
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1990 Jun; 42(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 2402543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Problems in expert assessment in child custody cases according to sections 1666, 1666a BGB in the controversy between control and assistance].
    Rüth U.
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 1998 Sep; 47(7):486-98. PubMed ID: 9796361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Legal family assessment in the case of alcoholic parents].
    Siefen RG, Boerger G, Klar W.
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 1996 Nov; 45(9):343-9. PubMed ID: 9036387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Medical, psychologic, and legal aspects of child custody disputes.
    Duncan JW.
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1978 Jul; 53(7):463-8. PubMed ID: 661385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [The attitude of children of divorce to child custody, court hearings and visiting rights--a survey in Zurich].
    Felder W.
    Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr; 1989 Jun; 17(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 2756790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A Critical Assessment of Child Custody Evaluations: Limited Science and a Flawed System.
    Emery RE, Otto RK, O'Donohue WT.
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2005 Jul; 6(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 26158277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Predictors of custody and visitation decisions by a family court clinic.
    Raub JM, Carson NJ, Cook BL, Wyshak G, Hauser BB.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013 Jul; 41(2):206-18. PubMed ID: 23771934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. From competition to complementarity. Legal issues and their clinical implications in custody.
    Shear LE.
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 1998 Apr; 7(2):311-34, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 9894066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Toward a child-centered approach to evaluating claims of alienation in high-conflict custody disputes.
    Nichols AM.
    Mich Law Rev; 2014 Feb; 112(4):663-88. PubMed ID: 24446573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical advice from the bench.
    Kass A.
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 1998 Apr; 7(2):247-57, v. PubMed ID: 9894062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Co-production of knowledge about custody criteria with subjects affected by their parents' custody dispute: a participatory study].
    Kaltenborn KF.
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2004 Mar; 53(3):167-81. PubMed ID: 15112844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Grandparents' visitation rights and custody.
    Stanton AM.
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 1998 Apr; 7(2):409-22. PubMed ID: 9894072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Using attachment measures in the context of providing expert witness through psychiatric assessment in family court proceedings].
    Besier T, Ziegenhain U, Fegert JM, Künster AK.
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2012 Apr; 61(4):255-70. PubMed ID: 22957398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. AACAP Official Action. Summary of the practice parameters for child custody evaluation.
    Herman SP, Bernet W.
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1997 Dec; 36(12):1784-7. PubMed ID: 9401340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.