These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
407 related items for PubMed ID: 18402582
1. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado. Wallace GN, Theobald DM, Ernst T, King K. Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Aggregating high-priority landscape areas to the parcel level: an easement implementation tool. Strager MP, Rosenberger RS. J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):290-8. PubMed ID: 16580124 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Coupled ecological-social dynamics in a forested landscape: spatial interactions and information flow. Satake A, Leslie HM, Iwasa Y, Levin SA. J Theor Biol; 2007 Jun 21; 246(4):695-707. PubMed ID: 17376488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the potential for conservation development: biophysical, economic, and institutional perspectives. Pejchar L, Morgan PM, Caldwell MR, Palmer C, Daily GC. Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb 21; 21(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17298512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land. Knight AT, Cowling RM, Difford M, Campbell BM. Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct 21; 24(5):1348-58. PubMed ID: 20345404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Devising appropriate policies and instruments in support of private conservation areas: lessons learned from the Klein Karoo, South Africa. Pasquini L, Cowling RM, Twyman C, Wainwright J. Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr 21; 24(2):470-8. PubMed ID: 19843125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perpetual conservation easements and landowners: evaluating easement knowledge, satisfaction and partner organization relationships. Stroman DA, Kreuter UP. J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec 15; 146():284-291. PubMed ID: 25190596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Incentive structure of and private landowner participation in an endangered species conservation program. Sorice MG, Haider W, Conner JR, Ditton RB. Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun 15; 25(3):587-96. PubMed ID: 21488955 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterizing urbanization, and agricultural and conservation land-use change in Riverside County, California, USA. Chen X, Li BL, Allen MF. Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2010 May 15; 1195 Suppl 1():E164-76. PubMed ID: 20586769 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Local land-use planning to conserve biodiversity: planners' perspectives on what works. Stokes DL, Hanson MF, Oaks DD, Straub JE, Ponio AV. Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr 15; 24(2):450-60. PubMed ID: 19906063 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach. Putten vI, Jennings SM, Louviere JJ, Burgess LB. J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct 15; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Interacting Social and Environmental Predictors for the Spatial Distribution of Conservation Lands. Baldwin RF, Leonard PB. PLoS One; 2015 Oct 15; 10(10):e0140540. PubMed ID: 26465155 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]