These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. An observational study of health professionals' use of evidence to inform the development of clinical management tools. Hutchinson AM, Johnston L. J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2203-11. PubMed ID: 18705739 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of objective measurement tools on communication and clinical decision making in neurological rehabilitation. Tyson SF, Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Apr; 18(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 20860596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: a qualitative study. Kidger J, Murdoch J, Donovan JL, Blazeby JM. BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):511-7. PubMed ID: 19250362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Barriers to evidence-based practice in primary care nursing--why viewing decision-making as context is helpful. Thompson C, McCaughan D, Cullum N, Sheldon T, Raynor P. J Adv Nurs; 2005 Nov; 52(4):432-44. PubMed ID: 16268847 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical hegemony in decision-making--a barrier to interdisciplinary working in intensive care? Coombs M, Ersser SJ. J Adv Nurs; 2004 May; 46(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 15066102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Do heart failure specialist nurses think differently when faced with 'hard' or 'easy' decisions: a judgement analysis. Thompson C, Spilsbury K, Dowding D, Pattenden J, Brownlow R. J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2174-84. PubMed ID: 18705737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What's so great about rehabilitation teams? An ethnographic study of interprofessional collaboration in a rehabilitation unit. Sinclair LB, Lingard LA, Mohabeer RN. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Jul; 90(7):1196-201. PubMed ID: 19577033 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality improvement in multidisciplinary cancer teams: an investigation of teamwork and clinical decision-making and cross-validation of assessments. Lamb BW, Sevdalis N, Mostafid H, Vincent C, Green JS. Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3535-43. PubMed ID: 21594706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nursing advocacy in an Australian multidisciplinary context: findings on medico-centrism. McGrath P, Holewa H, McGrath Z. Scand J Caring Sci; 2006 Dec; 20(4):394-402. PubMed ID: 17116148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The 'actualities' of knowledge work: an institutional ethnography of multi-disciplinary primary health care teams. Quinlan E. Sociol Health Illn; 2009 Jul; 31(5):625-41. PubMed ID: 19392938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The multidisciplinary meeting: An indispensable aid to communication between different specialities. Ruhstaller T, Roe H, Thürlimann B, Nicoll JJ. Eur J Cancer; 2006 Oct; 42(15):2459-62. PubMed ID: 16934974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and evaluation of a checklist to support decision making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: MDT-QuIC. Lamb BW, Sevdalis N, Vincent C, Green JS. Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):1759-65. PubMed ID: 22207050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspective. Jalil R, Ahmed M, Green JS, Sevdalis N. Int J Surg; 2013 Jun; 11(5):389-94. PubMed ID: 23500030 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]