These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

273 related items for PubMed ID: 18404108

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
    Rousseau MA, Bonnet X, Skalli W.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan 01; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY, Kang H, Rouleau JP, Hollister SJ, Marca FL.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul 01; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, Woo Kim S, Cappuccino A, Pimenta L.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The influence of the axial, antero-posterior and lateral positions of the center of rotation of a ball-and-socket disc prosthesis on the cervical spine biomechanics.
    Galbusera F, Anasetti F, Bellini CM, Costa F, Fornari M.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jun 15; 25(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 20149505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Hayes V, Sidiqi F, Dabbah M, Sefter JC, Hu N, Beatson H.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep 01; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
    Rousseau MA, Bradford DS, Bertagnoli R, Hu SS, Lotz JC.
    Spine J; 2006 Sep 01; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Biomechanics of the C5-C6 spinal unit before and after placement of a disc prosthesis.
    Galbusera F, Fantigrossi A, Raimondi MT, Sassi M, Fornari M, Assietti R.
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2006 Nov 01; 5(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 16514519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of cervical spine biomechanics after fixed- and mobile-core artificial disc replacement: a finite element analysis.
    Lee SH, Im YJ, Kim KT, Kim YH, Park WM, Kim K.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr 20; 36(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 21245792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
    Snyder JT, Tzermiadianos MN, Ghanayem AJ, Voronov LI, Rinella A, Dooris A, Carandang G, Renner SM, Havey RM, Patwardhan AG.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec 15; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK, Kim YE, Wang KC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May 20; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cervical spine biomechanics following implantation of a disc prosthesis.
    Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Raimondi MT, Fornari M, Assietti R.
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Nov 20; 30(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 18359659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Aryan HE, Newman CB, Lu DC, Hu SS, Tay BK, Bradford DS, Puttlitz CM, Ames CP.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr 20; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM, Park C, Lee K, Lee S.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep 15; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Facet joint contact pressure is not significantly affected by ProDisc cervical disc arthroplasty in sagittal bending: a single-level cadaveric study.
    Bauman JA, Jaumard NV, Guarino BB, Weisshaar CL, Lipschutz DE, Welch WC, Winkelstein BA.
    Spine J; 2012 Oct 15; 12(10):949-59. PubMed ID: 22975463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Finite element modeling of multi-level cervical spinal segments (C3-C6) and biomechanical analysis of an elastomer-type prosthetic disc.
    Ha SK.
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul 15; 28(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 16278091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA, Auerbach JD, Balderston RA, Kurtz SM.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov 01; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.