These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

629 related items for PubMed ID: 18405814

  • 1. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
    Sloss EA, Southard KA, Qian F, Stock SE, Mann KR, Meyer DL, Southard TE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C, McGorray SP, Brazeau L, King GJ, Wheeler TT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Treatment and posttreatment effects of mandibular cervical headgear followed by fixed appliances in Class III malocclusion.
    Rey D, Angel D, Oberti G, Baccetti T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):371-8; quiz 476.e1. PubMed ID: 18331935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T, Rogers M, Andrews L, Martin C, Tremont T, Gunel E, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M, Torget O, Vandevska-Radunovic V.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes.
    Sharma AA, Lee RT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 15821692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.
    Hägglund P, Segerdal S, Forsberg CM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 18216374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.