These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

353 related items for PubMed ID: 18427306

  • 1. Implications of lumbar plexus anatomy for removal of total disc replacements through a posterior approach.
    Bumpass DB, Keller TC, Robinson EP, Marks I, Iwanik M, Arlet V, Shen FH.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr 20; 33(9):E274-8. PubMed ID: 18427306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Anatomic mapping of lumbar nerve roots during a direct lateral transpsoas approach to the spine: a cadaveric study.
    Banagan K, Gelb D, Poelstra K, Ludwig S.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May 15; 36(11):E687-91. PubMed ID: 21217450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charité lumbar artificial disc replacement.
    Wagner WH, Regan JJ, Leary SP, Lanman TH, Johnson JP, Rao RK, Cossman DV.
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 Dec 15; 44(6):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17145428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Revision and explantation strategies involving the CHARITE lumbar artificial disc replacement.
    Leary SP, Regan JJ, Lanman TH, Wagner WH.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr 20; 32(9):1001-11. PubMed ID: 17450076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The paraspinal splitting approach: a possible approach to perform multiple intercosto-lumbar neurotizations: an anatomic study.
    Vialle R, Harding I, Charosky S, Tadié M.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct 15; 32(22):E631-4. PubMed ID: 18090071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S, Rivera Y, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE.
    Spine J; 2009 Oct 15; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Morphometric analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retroperitoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lateral approach in normal and deformed spines.
    Regev GJ, Chen L, Dhawan M, Lee YP, Garfin SR, Kim CW.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May 20; 34(12):1330-5. PubMed ID: 19455010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery.
    Moro T, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Yaginuma H.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar 01; 28(5):423-8; discussion 427-8. PubMed ID: 12616150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component.
    Kurtz SM, Peloza J, Siskey R, Villarraga ML.
    Spine J; 2005 Mar 01; 5(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 15863092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study.
    Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, Vale FL.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Aug 01; 13(2):260-6. PubMed ID: 20672964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Removal of the Charité lumbar artificial disc prosthesis: surgical technique.
    de Maat GH, Punt IM, van Rhijn LW, Schurink GW, van Ooij A.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul 01; 22(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 19525788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The relationship of intrapsoas nerves during a transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: anatomic study.
    Park DK, Lee MJ, Lin EL, Singh K, An HS, Phillips FM.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun 01; 23(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 20084033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Safe zone for retractor placement to the lumbar spine via the transpsoas approach.
    Spivak JM, Paulino CB, Patel A, Shanti N, Pathare N.
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2013 Apr 01; 21(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 23629994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine.
    Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Feb 01; 10(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 19278328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Precision of traditional approaches for lumbar plexus block: impact and management of interindividual anatomic variability.
    Heller AR, Fuchs A, Rössel T, Vicent O, Wiessner D, Funk RH, Koch T, Litz RJ.
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Sep 01; 111(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 19672183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assessment of neuroforaminal decompression in degenerative spinal stenosis.
    Gill TJ, Mason MD.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar 01; (348):135-9. PubMed ID: 9553545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM, Park C, Lee K, Lee S.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep 15; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.