These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

859 related items for PubMed ID: 18429859

  • 1. Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline.
    Tsui PW, McPherson B, Wong EC, Ng IH.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 18429859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high-risk neonates].
    Xu FL, Xing QJ, Cheng XY.
    Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 10(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 18706161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: which test is best?
    Dort JC, Tobolski C, Brown D.
    J Otolaryngol; 2000 Aug; 29(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 11003070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [A combined neonatal hearing screening protocol].
    Almenar Latorre A, Tapia Toca MC, Fernández Pérez C, Moro Serrano M.
    An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Jul; 57(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 12139894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cost and cost-effectiveness of universal screening for hearing loss in newborns.
    Kezirian EJ, White KR, Yueh B, Sullivan SD.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Apr; 124(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 11283492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.
    Johnson JL, White KR, Widen JE, Gravel JS, James M, Kennalley T, Maxon AB, Spivak L, Sullivan-Mahoney M, Vohr BR, Weirather Y, Holstrum J.
    Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Sensitivity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brain-stem response in neonatal hearing screening, a comparative study].
    Xu ZM, Li J, Hu TZ, Sun JH, Shen XM.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb 25; 83(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12812641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Audiology characteristics in newborns and infants who failed in the hearing screening by transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions: 89 cases study].
    Huang LH, Deng XQ, Yang YL, Wang SJ, Tang XQ, Guo LS, Han DM.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Mar 25; 46(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21575409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
    De Capua B, De Felice C, Costantini D, Bagnoli F, Passali D.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb 25; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Further examination of infants referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Wada T, Kubo T, Aiba T, Yamane H.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2004 Oct 25; (554):17-25. PubMed ID: 15513505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns.
    De Capua B, Costantini D, Martufi C, Latini G, Gentile M, De Felice C.
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep 25; 83(9):601-6. PubMed ID: 17307313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Meier S, Narabayashi O, Probst R, Schmuziger N.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul 25; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [A preliminary study of a hearing screening model for newborn].
    Liu Z, Bu X, Xing G, Lu L.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug 25; 36(4):292-4. PubMed ID: 12762000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
    Mills DM.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct 25; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions.
    Vander Werff KR, Prieve BA, Georgantas LM.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep 25; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Hearing screening of 10,501 newborns].
    Nie WY, Gong LX, Liu YJ, Xiang LL, Lin Q, Qi YS, Nie YJ.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb 25; 83(4):274-7. PubMed ID: 12812640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 43.