These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
990 related items for PubMed ID: 18435186
21. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives. Khoroushi M, Karvandi TM, Kamali B, Mazaheri H. Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique. Fabianelli A, Sgarra A, Goracci C, Cantoro A, Pollington S, Ferrari M. Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20533631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Microleakage of class V resin composites using various self-etching adhesives: an in vitro study. Chandra PV, Harikumar V, Ramkiran D, Krishna MJ, Gouda MV. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan 01; 14(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23579893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations. Yalçin F, Korkmaz Y, Başeren M. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov 01; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A microleakage study of single-bottle adhesives applied to enamel and cementum and aged by both occlusal loading and thermocycling. Ben-Amar A, Pilo R, Shapinko E, Lewinstein I. Quintessence Int; 2005 Mar 01; 36(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 15887502 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume. da Silva AF, Piva E, Demarco FF, Correr Sobrinho L, Osinga PW. Oper Dent; 2006 Mar 01; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives. Duarte S, de Freitas CR, Saad JR, Sadan A. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul 01; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Microleakage of a packable composite associated with different materials. Loguercio AD, Bauer JR, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE, Busato AL. J Clin Dent; 2002 Jul 01; 13(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 11887513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining. Guéders AM, Charpentier JF, Albert AI, Geerts SO. Oper Dent; 2006 Jul 01; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Owens BM, Johnson WW. J Adhes Dent; 2005 Jul 01; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations. Araujo Fde O, Vieira LC, Monteiro Junior S. Oper Dent; 2006 Jul 01; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA. Am J Dent; 2001 Jun 01; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations. Souza-Junior EJ, Prieto LT, Araújo CT, Paulillo LA. Oper Dent; 2012 Jun 01; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations. Hardan LS, Amm EW, Ghayad A. Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec 01; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities. Yazici AR, Ozgünaltay G, Dayangaç B. Oper Dent; 2003 Dec 01; 28(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 14653293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of restorative techniques on marginal adaptation and dye penetration around Class V restorations. Pereira Ade F, Poiate IA, Poiate E, Rodrigues FP, Turbino ML, Miranda WG. Gen Dent; 2012 Dec 01; 60(1):e17-21. PubMed ID: 22313988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems. Bedran de Castro AK, Pimenta LA, Amaral CM, Ambrosano GM. J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002 Dec 01; 14(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 12008798 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations. Attar N, Korkmaz Y. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb 01; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB. Oper Dent; 2000 Feb 01; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities. Yazici AR, Baseren M, Dayangaç B. Oper Dent; 2003 Feb 01; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]