These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

176 related items for PubMed ID: 18435375

  • 1. The effect of a chlorhexidine containing cavity disinfectant on the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement following ART: 24-month results.
    Ersin NK, Aykut A, Candan U, Onçağ O, Eronat C, Kose T.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18435375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP, Luiz RR, Maia LC.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, Zanatta FB, Balbinot CE, García-Godoy F, De Araujo FB.
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
    Rutar J, McAllan L, Tyas MJ.
    Pediatr Dent; 2000 Dec; 22(6):486-8. PubMed ID: 11132508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of the ART approach and materials in peri-urban farm schools of the Johannesburg area.
    Mickenautsch S, Kopsala J, Rudolph MJ, Ogunbodede EO.
    SADJ; 2000 Jul; 55(7):364-8. PubMed ID: 12608196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS, Neto RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May 01; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study.
    Ertugrul F, Cogulu D, Ozdemir Y, Ersin N.
    Med Princ Pract; 2010 May 01; 19(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 20134179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A one-year clinical evaluation of a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
    Yilmaz Y, Eyuboglu O, Kocogullari ME, Belduz N.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Feb 15; 7(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 16491149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.