These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

195 related items for PubMed ID: 18442132

  • 1. SFCscore: scoring functions for affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
    Sotriffer CA, Sanschagrin P, Matter H, Klebe G.
    Proteins; 2008 Nov 01; 73(2):395-419. PubMed ID: 18442132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
    Pearlman DA, Rao BG, Charifson P.
    Proteins; 2008 May 15; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
    Muegge I, Martin YC.
    J Med Chem; 1999 Mar 11; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Predicting protein-ligand binding affinities: a low scoring game?
    Marsden PM, Puvanendrampillai D, Mitchell JB, Glen RC.
    Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov 21; 2(22):3267-73. PubMed ID: 15534704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
    Ferrara P, Gohlke H, Price DJ, Klebe G, Brooks CL.
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jun 03; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. PMF scoring revisited.
    Muegge I.
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct 05; 49(20):5895-902. PubMed ID: 17004705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Generalized modeling of enzyme-ligand interactions using proteochemometrics and local protein substructures.
    Strömbergsson H, Kryshtafovych A, Prusis P, Fidelis K, Wikberg JE, Komorowski J, Hvidsten TR.
    Proteins; 2006 Nov 15; 65(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 16948162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Information theory-based scoring function for the structure-based prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity.
    Kulharia M, Goody RS, Jackson RM.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct 15; 48(10):1990-8. PubMed ID: 18767831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. gCOMBINE: A graphical user interface to perform structure-based comparative binding energy (COMBINE) analysis on a set of ligand-receptor complexes.
    Gil-Redondo R, Klett J, Gago F, Morreale A.
    Proteins; 2010 Jan 15; 78(1):162-72. PubMed ID: 19705486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.