These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

396 related items for PubMed ID: 18444760

  • 1. Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.
    Unsworth N, Engle RW.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):616-30. PubMed ID: 18444760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accessing information in working memory: can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time?
    Oberauer K, Bialkova S.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):64-87. PubMed ID: 19203170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory.
    Bao M, Li ZH, Zhang DR.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 17723072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence.
    Schmiedek F, Oberauer K, Wilhelm O, Süss HM, Wittmann WW.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):414-29. PubMed ID: 17696691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Working memory costs of task switching.
    Liefooghe B, Barrouillet P, Vandierendonck A, Camos V.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. On the division of working memory and long-term memory and their relation to intelligence: A latent variable approach.
    Unsworth N.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 20022311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences.
    Schneider DW, Logan GD.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):623-40. PubMed ID: 17087577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
    Kane MJ, Poole BJ, Tuholski SW, Engle RW.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW, Logan GD.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities.
    Ackerman PL, Beier ME, Boyle MO.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Dec; 131(4):567-89. PubMed ID: 12500864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Learning, working memory, and intelligence revisited.
    Tamez E, Myerson J, Hale S.
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 18308483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure.
    Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Perrig WJ, Meier B.
    Memory; 2010 May; 18(4):394-412. PubMed ID: 20408039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The focus of attention in working memory: evidence from a word updating task.
    Janczyk M, Grabowski J.
    Memory; 2011 Feb; 19(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 21287425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Two dissociable updating processes in working memory.
    Kessler Y, Meiran N.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1339-48. PubMed ID: 18980398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Ageing and switching of the focus of attention in working memory: results from a modified N-back task.
    Verhaeghen P, Basak C.
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jan; 58(1):134-54. PubMed ID: 15881295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of affective valence on working memory processes.
    Gotoh F.
    Int J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 43(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 22023500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Measuring the interrelations among multiple paradigms of visual attention: an individual differences approach.
    Huang L, Mo L, Li Y.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):414-28. PubMed ID: 22250865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Mapping the developmental constraints on working memory span performance.
    Bayliss DM, Jarrold C, Baddeley AD, Gunn DM, Leigh E.
    Dev Psychol; 2005 Jul; 41(4):579-97. PubMed ID: 16060806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. No age differences in complex memory search: older adults search as efficiently as younger adults.
    Lange EB, Verhaeghen P.
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 19290742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Time-related decay or interference-based forgetting in working memory?
    Portrat S, Barrouillet P, Camos V.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1561-4. PubMed ID: 18980415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.