These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

285 related items for PubMed ID: 18455173

  • 1. Effect of cornea material stiffness on measured intraocular pressure.
    Kwon TH, Ghaboussi J, Pecknold DA, Hashash YM.
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(8):1707-13. PubMed ID: 18455173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y, Hirose N, Kubota T, Tawara A.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A, Crabb DP, Spratt A, Garway-Heath DF.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A, Loge K, Schroeder B, Füllhas MO, Wiegand W.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.
    Broman AT, Congdon NG, Bandeen-Roche K, Quigley HA.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Aug; 16(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 18091174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Intraocular pressure: Goldmann tonometry, computational model, and calibration equation.
    Guzmán AF, Castilla AA, Guarnieri FA, Rodríguez FR.
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Jan; 22(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 21946545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Numerical study on human cornea and modified multiparametric correction equation for Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Khan MA.
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Feb; 30():91-102. PubMed ID: 24269944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accurate intraocular pressure prediction from applanation response data using genetic algorithm and neural networks.
    Ghaboussi J, Kwon TH, Pecknold DA, Hashash YM.
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct 16; 42(14):2301-6. PubMed ID: 19660756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [The relationship between central corneal thickness and Perkins applanation tonometry in rabbits].
    Luan CS, Chen XM, Deng YP, Wang L, Liu DJ, Cui M, Li J.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jul 16; 41(7):642-6. PubMed ID: 16080901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Diurnal variation of central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry estimates of intraocular pressure.
    Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Aggarwala S, Evian S, Khosla J, Perera R.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan 16; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 17224746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Contact-based stiffness sensing of human eye.
    Kurita Y, Kempf R, Iida Y, Okude J, Kaneko M, Mishima HK, Tsukamoto H, Sugimoto E, Katakura S, Kobayashi K, Kiuchi Y.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb 16; 55(2 Pt 1):739-45. PubMed ID: 18270012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
    Lanza M, Borrelli M, De Bernardo M, Filosa ML, Rosa N.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep 16; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Incorporating corneal pachymetry into the management of glaucoma.
    Iester M, Mete M, Figus M, Frezzotti P.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep 16; 35(9):1623-8. PubMed ID: 19683164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [The effect of central corneal thickness on tonometry].
    Böhm AG.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Feb 16; 228(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 21328171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Role of corneal biomechanical properties in applanation tonometry measurements.
    Kwon TH, Ghaboussi J, Pecknold DA, Hashash Y.
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Jul 16; 26(7):512-9. PubMed ID: 19715267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb 16; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis.
    Liu J, Roberts CJ.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan 16; 31(1):146-55. PubMed ID: 15721707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Young's modulus in normal corneas and the effect on applanation tonometry.
    Hamilton KE, Pye DC.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jun 16; 85(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 18521022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Pakrou N, Gray T, Mills R, Landers J, Craig J.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Jun 16; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.