These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

538 related items for PubMed ID: 18462205

  • 1. Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a retrospective study.
    Siadat H, Alikhasi M, Mirfazaelian A, Geramipanah F, Zaery F.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 18462205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
    Peñarrocha M, Larrazábal C, Balaguer J, Serrano C, Silvestre J, Bagán JV.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 May; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
    Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 May; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
    Alfadda SA, Attard NJ, David LA.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009 May; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
    Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, Locker D, Klemetti E, Chehade A, Savard A, Feine JS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 May; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
    Bakke M, Holm B, Gotfredsen K.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002 May; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers.
    Mumcu E, Bilhan H, Geckili O.
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e618-23. PubMed ID: 21726276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
    Visser A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006 Jun; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
    Walton JN, MacEntee MI, Glick N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002 Jun; 17(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 12074455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
    Walton JN, Glick N, Macentee MI.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M, van Kampen F, van der Bilt A, Bosman F.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
    ELsyad MA.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI, Walton JN, Glick N.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
    Krennmair G, Krainhöfner M, Piehslinger E.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Jan; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sex differences in denture satisfaction.
    Pan S, Awad M, Thomason JM, Dufresne E, Kobayashi T, Kimoto S, Wollin SD, Feine JS.
    J Dent; 2008 May; 36(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 18394770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
    Ellis JS, Burawi G, Walls A, Thomason JM.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures.
    Brennan M, Houston F, O'Sullivan M, O'Connell B.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Nov; 25(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 20657876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
    Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Visser A, Vissink A.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses.
    Heydecke G, Klemetti E, Awad MA, Lund JP, Feine JS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Jul; 16(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 12854797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A prospective 2-year clinical evaluation of overdentures attached to nonsplinted implants utilizing ERA attachments.
    Landa LS, Cho SC, Froum SJ, Elian N, Tarnow DP.
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 13(2):151-6; quiz 158. PubMed ID: 11315434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.