These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

945 related items for PubMed ID: 18462345

  • 1. Aortic valve replacement: choice between mechanical valves and bioprostheses.
    Silberman S, Oren A, Dotan M, Merin O, Fink D, Deeb M, Bitran D.
    J Card Surg; 2008; 23(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 18462345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
    Kulik A, Bédard P, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Masters RG, Mesana TG, Ruel M.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years.
    Stassano P, Di Tommaso L, Monaco M, Iorio F, Pepino P, Spampinato N, Vosa C.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov 10; 54(20):1862-8. PubMed ID: 19892237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.
    Davis EA, Greene PS, Cameron DE, Gott VI, Laschinger JC, Stuart RS, Sussman MS, Watkins L, Baumgartner WA.
    Circulation; 1996 Nov 01; 94(9 Suppl):II121-5. PubMed ID: 8901731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless valve: five-year follow up.
    Nyawo B, Graham R, Hunter S.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jan 01; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17315382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Results of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting in the VA population.
    Alsoufi B, Karamlou T, Slater M, Shen I, Ungerleider R, Ravichandran P.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan 01; 15(1):12-8; discussion 18-9. PubMed ID: 16480007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
    Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Caprili L, Testolin L, Thiene G, Gerosa G.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul 01; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 48.