These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

493 related items for PubMed ID: 18463482

  • 1. Effects of different contact lens materials and contact lens-wearing periods on conjunctival cytology in asymptomatic contact lens wearers.
    Tomatir DK, Erda N, Gürlü VP.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 May; 34(3):166-8. PubMed ID: 18463482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of soft contact lenses on conjunctival surface.
    Cakmak SS, Unlü MK, Karaca C, Nergiz Y, Ipek S.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Oct; 29(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 14555898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Conjunctival impression cytology in contact lens wearers.
    Simon P, Jaison SG, Chopra SK, Jacob S.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2002 Dec; 50(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 12532495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Conjunctival impression cytology in patients wearing contact lenses.
    Adar S, Kanpolat A, Sürücü S, Ucakhan OO.
    Cornea; 1997 May; 16(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 9143800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a).
    Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Dec; 32(6):281-6. PubMed ID: 17099389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Morphological changes of the conjunctival epithelium in contact lens wearers evaluated by impression cytology.
    Aragona P, Ferreri G, Micali A, Puzzolo D.
    Eye (Lond); 1998 Dec; 12 ( Pt 3a)():461-6. PubMed ID: 9775250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Nucleus and cell size changes in human bulbar conjunctival cells after soft contact lens wear, as assessed by impression cytology.
    Doughty MJ, Naase T.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2008 Jun; 31(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 18258477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Objective assessment of squamous metaplasia of conjunctival epithelial cells as associated with soft contact lens wear versus non-lens wearers.
    Doughty MJ.
    Cornea; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1095-102. PubMed ID: 25055148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Conjunctival epithelial flaps with 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn J, Gilmartin B.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jan; 34(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 18180681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A novel method to predict the dry eye symptoms in new contact lens wearers.
    Pult H, Murphy PJ, Purslow C.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 86(9):E1042-50. PubMed ID: 19668016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of three months of soft contact lens wear on conjunctival cytology.
    Sapkota K, Franco S, Sampaio P, Lira M.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jul; 99(4):336-41. PubMed ID: 27146845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Conjunctival cytology in hard and soft contact lens wear.
    Hirji NK, Scott J, Sabell AG.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985 Jul; 5(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 4047658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Confocal microscopy of the bulbar conjunctiva in contact lens wear.
    Efron N, Al-Dossari M, Pritchard N.
    Cornea; 2010 Jan; 29(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 19907292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Adverse events and discontinuations during 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):288-92. PubMed ID: 17993823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Changes in ocular physiology, tear film characteristics, and symptomatology with 18 months silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16501408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Corneal and conjunctival epithelial staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers.
    Brautaset RL, Nilsson M, Leach N, Miller WL, Gire A, Quintero S, Bergmanson JP.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Nov; 34(6):312-6. PubMed ID: 18997539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Deposition of lipid, protein, and secretory phospholipase A2 on hydrophilic contact lenses.
    Mochizuki H, Yamada M, Hatou S, Kawashima M, Hata S.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jan; 34(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18180684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Induction of conjunctival epithelial alterations by contact lens wearing. A prospective study.
    Knop E, Brewitt H.
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1992 Jan; 1(3-4):125-34. PubMed ID: 1483123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Objective assessment of contact lens wear-associated conjunctival squamous metaplasia by linear measures of cell size, shape and nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratios.
    Doughty MJ.
    Curr Eye Res; 2011 Jul; 36(7):599-606. PubMed ID: 21599455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of adverse events with daily disposable hydrogels and spectacle wear: results from a 12-month prospective clinical trial.
    Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA, Naduvilath T, Velala I, Gora R, Krishnamachary M, Rao GN.
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2327-34. PubMed ID: 14644714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.