These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

197 related items for PubMed ID: 18467826

  • 1. Cytogenetics of wild and captive bred non-domestic animals.
    Rubes J, Musilova P, Mastromonaco GF.
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008; 120(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 18467826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Chromosome variation in the embryos of domestic animals.
    King WA.
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008; 120(1-2):81-90. PubMed ID: 18467828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild.
    Araki H, Cooper B, Blouin MS.
    Science; 2007 Oct 05; 318(5847):100-3. PubMed ID: 17916734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evidence for introgressive hybridization of captive markhor (Capra falconeri) with domestic goat: cautions for reintroduction.
    Hammer SE, Schwammer HM, Suchentrunk F.
    Biochem Genet; 2008 Apr 05; 46(3-4):216-26. PubMed ID: 18228130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Captive breeding, reintroduction, and the conservation of amphibians.
    Griffiths RA, Pavajeau L.
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug 05; 22(4):852-61. PubMed ID: 18616746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Methods and prospects for using molecular data in captive breeding programs: an empirical example using parma wallabies (Macropus parma).
    Ivy JA, Miller A, Lacy RC, Dewoody JA.
    J Hered; 2009 Aug 05; 100(4):441-54. PubMed ID: 19423700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Disorders of sexual development in wild and captive exotic animals.
    Mastromonaco GF, Houck ML, Bergfelt DR.
    Sex Dev; 2012 Aug 05; 6(1-3):84-95. PubMed ID: 22004948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A genetic diversity comparison between captive individuals and wild individuals of Elliot's Pheasant (Syrmaticus ellioti) using mitochondrial DNA.
    Jiang PP, Lang QL, Fang SG, Ding P, Chen LM.
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2005 May 05; 6(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 15822157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mammalian cytogenetics and conservation of species.
    Benirschke K, Kumamoto AT.
    J Hered; 1991 May 05; 82(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 2061591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Veterinary cytogenetics: past and perspective.
    Basrur PK, Stranzinger G.
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008 May 05; 120(1-2):11-25. PubMed ID: 18467822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Fluorescence in situ hybridization applied to domestic animal cytogenetics.
    Rubes J, Pinton A, Bonnet-Garnier A, Fillon V, Musilova P, Michalova K, Kubickova S, Ducos A, Yerle M.
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2009 May 05; 126(1-2):34-48. PubMed ID: 20016155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reproductive problems directly attributable to long-term captivity--asymmetric reproductive aging.
    Hermes R, Hildebrandt TB, Göritz F.
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2004 Jul 05; 82-83():49-60. PubMed ID: 15271443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Genetic evaluation of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums Matschie's tree kangaroo (Dendrolagus matschiei) captive breeding program.
    McGreevy TJ, Dabek L, Husband TP.
    Zoo Biol; 2011 Jul 05; 30(6):636-46. PubMed ID: 22147592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The guppy as a conservation model: implications of parasitism and inbreeding for reintroduction success.
    van Oosterhout C, Smith AM, Hänfling B, Ramnarine IW, Mohammed RS, Cable J.
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec 05; 21(6):1573-83. PubMed ID: 18173481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Equine clinical cytogenetics: the past and future.
    Lear TL, Bailey E.
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008 Dec 05; 120(1-2):42-9. PubMed ID: 18467824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Artificial insemination in deer and non-domestic bovids.
    Morrow CJ, Penfold LM, Wolfe BA.
    Theriogenology; 2009 Jan 01; 71(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 18986694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Captive breeding does not alter brain volume in a marsupial over a few generations.
    Guay PJ, Parrott M, Selwood L.
    Zoo Biol; 2012 Jan 01; 31(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 23900892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Karyotype evaluation among young horse populations in Poland.
    Bugno M, Słota E, Kościelny M.
    Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 2007 May 01; 149(5):227-32. PubMed ID: 17557614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Captive and wild orangutan (Pongo sp.) survivorship: a comparison and the influence of management.
    Wich SA, Shumaker RW, Perkins L, de Vries H.
    Am J Primatol; 2009 Aug 01; 71(8):680-6. PubMed ID: 19434629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Value of captive populations for quantitative genetics research.
    Pelletier F, Réale D, Watters J, Boakes EH, Garant D.
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2009 May 01; 24(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 19269058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.