These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The specific-word frequency effect: implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. Caramazza A, Costa A, Miozzo M, Bi Y. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1430-50. PubMed ID: 11713878 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Calling all codes: interactive effects of semantics, phonology, and orthography produce dissociations in a repetition blindness paradigm. Stolz JA, Neely JH. Am J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 121(1):105-28. PubMed ID: 18437804 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Syntactic constraints in the retrieval of homophone orthography. White KK, Abrams L, McWhite CB, Hagler HL. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 20053052 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The representation of homophones: Evidence from anomia. Jacobs M, Singer N, Miozzo M. Cogn Neuropsychol; 2004 Dec 01; 21(8):840-66. PubMed ID: 21038236 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What determines the speed of lexical access: homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al. (2003). Caramazza A, Bi Y, Costa A, Miozzo M. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan 01; 30(1):278-82. PubMed ID: 14736312 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Are the same phoneme and lexical layers used in speech production and comprehension? A case-series test of model of aphasic speech production. Hanley JR, Nickels L. Cortex; 2009 Jun 01; 45(6):784-90. PubMed ID: 19103444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Knowing its gender without knowing its name: differential access to lexical information in a jargonaphasic patient. Macoir J, Béland R. Neurocase; 2004 Dec 01; 10(6):471-82. PubMed ID: 15788287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]