These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

305 related items for PubMed ID: 18472335

  • 1. Contralateral noise has possible asymmetric frequency-sensitive effect on the 2F1-F2 otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Atcherson SR, Martin MJ, Lintvedt R.
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun 13; 438(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 18472335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F, Boettcher FA, Sun XM.
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr 13; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears.
    Sun XM.
    Hear Res; 2008 Mar 13; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression.
    Sun XM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun 13; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Müller J, Janssen T, Zenner HP.
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan 13; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
    Bolay H, Bayazit YA, Gündüz B, Ugur AK, Akçali D, Altunyay S, Ilica S, Babacan A.
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr 13; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Effect of contralateral noise exposure on otoacoustic distortion product emissions in man].
    Richter B, Hauser R, Löhle E.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Mar 13; 74(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7755853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C, Kössl M.
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar 13; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of contralateral stimulation by two-tone complexes, narrow-band and broad-band noise signals on the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission levels in humans.
    Lisowska G, Smurzynski J, Morawski K, Namyslowski G, Probst R.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2002 Sep 13; 122(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 12403123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C, Wittekindt A, Kössl M.
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May 13; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW, Butler BE, Saunders TJ, Allen P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct 13; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Separating the contributions of olivocochlear and middle ear muscle reflexes in modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emission levels.
    Wolter NE, Harrison RV, James AL.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014 Oct 13; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24335024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W, Yang Y, Zhang W.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug 13; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI, Zhu X, Frisina RD.
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov 13; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the quadratic distortion product f2-f1 in humans.
    Wittekindt A, Gaese BH, Kössl M.
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan 13; 247(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 18951964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Age related changes to the dynamics of contralateral DPOAE suppression in human subjects.
    Konomi U, Kanotra S, James AL, Harrison RV.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun 16; 43(1):15. PubMed ID: 24934087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct 16; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Measurement of medial olivocochlear efferent activity in humans: comparison of different distortion product otoacoustic emission-based paradigms.
    Wagner W, Heyd A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct 16; 32(8):1379-88. PubMed ID: 21921859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Long-term sound conditioning increases distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes and decreases olivocochlear efferent reflex strength.
    Peng JH, Tao ZZ, Huang ZW.
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul 16; 18(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 17589320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Harrison RV, Sharma A, Brown T, Jiwani S, James AL.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr 16; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.