These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

767 related items for PubMed ID: 18472530

  • 21. Effect of various putty-wash impression techniques on marginal fit of cast crowns.
    Nissan J, Rosner O, Bukhari MA, Ghelfan O, Pilo R.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(1):e37-42. PubMed ID: 23342356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. An alternative putty/wash impression technique.
    Bassi GS.
    Dent Update; 2000 Oct; 27(8):376-8. PubMed ID: 11218529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A build-up impression technique for the edentulous mandible using various viscosities of silicone impression material.
    Fitzgerald M.
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 60(3):122-5. PubMed ID: 25080637
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Smith GM, Taylor WG.
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Wataha JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The altered cast impression technique: anatomic and functional considerations.
    Stillwell KD.
    Todays FDA; 2009 Aug; 21(8):19-21, 23. PubMed ID: 19728461
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A, Soderholm KJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
    Kuo SB, Hong HH, Tsai TP, Shen YF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A combined direct dowel and indirect core technique.
    Mekayarajjananonth T, Kiat-amnuay S, Salinas TJ.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 11203901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 39.