These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
246 related items for PubMed ID: 18473661
1. Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: analyses of response time distributions. Roelofs A. J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):303-23. PubMed ID: 18473661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements. Roelofs A. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):353-68. PubMed ID: 18315411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning. Roelofs A. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval. Vitkovitch M, Cooper E. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012 Dec; 65(6):1229-40. PubMed ID: 22390174 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning. Perlman A, Tzelgov J. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):118-30. PubMed ID: 16478345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Teaching adults new words: the role of practice and consolidation. Clay F, Bowers JS, Davis CJ, Hanley DA. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):970-6. PubMed ID: 17723073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production. Abdel Rahman R, Melinger A. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 17470008 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Mahon BZ, Costa A, Peterson R, Vargas KA, Caramazza A. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):503-35. PubMed ID: 17470003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition. Yap MJ, Balota DA. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect. Siakaluk PD, Pexman PM, Aguilera L, Owen WJ, Sears CR. Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):433-43. PubMed ID: 17258186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Topolinski S, Strack F. J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An enquiry into the process of categorization of pictures and words. Viswanathan M, Childers TL. Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):267-87. PubMed ID: 12705535 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Item and attribute storage of pictures and words in memory. Park DC. Am J Psychol; 1980 Dec; 93(4):603-15. PubMed ID: 7212130 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]