These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

382 related items for PubMed ID: 18485606

  • 1. Ageing without hearing loss or cognitive impairment causes a decrease in speech intelligibility only in informational maskers.
    Rajan R, Cainer KE.
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun 23; 154(2):784-95. PubMed ID: 18485606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V, Molis MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr 23; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Apr 23; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S, Dillon H.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr 23; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb 23; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T, Vercammen C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb 23; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug 23; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Aug 23; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
    Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T.
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct 23; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May 23; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.
    Mattys SL, Brooks J, Cooke M.
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Nov 23; 59(3):203-43. PubMed ID: 19423089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N, Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep 23; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech perception in noise for children with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony type hearing loss.
    Rance G, Barker E, Mok M, Dowell R, Rincon A, Garratt R.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun 23; 28(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 17485984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L, Kesser B, Cole E.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep 23; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec 23; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA, Rudner M, Johnsrude IS, Festen JM, van Beek JH, Rönnberg J.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Dec 23; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S, Dillon H, Newall P.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb 23; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL, Doherty KA.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Feb 23; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech.
    Glasberg BR, Moore BC.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1989 Feb 23; 32():1-25. PubMed ID: 2711118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C, Kramer SE, Houtgast T.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct 23; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.