These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

388 related items for PubMed ID: 18486202

  • 1. Adnexal masses: accuracy of detection and differentiation with multidetector computed tomography.
    Tsili AC, Tsampoulas C, Charisiadi A, Kalef-Ezra J, Dousias V, Paraskevaidis E, Efremidis SC.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18486202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of multidetector CT and MR imaging in the differentiation of adnexal masses.
    Tsili AC, Tsampoulas C, Argyropoulou M, Navrozoglou I, Alamanos Y, Paraskevaidis E, Efremidis SC.
    Eur Radiol; 2008 May; 18(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 18193235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.
    Zhang J, Mironov S, Hricak H, Ishill NM, Moskowitz CS, Soslow RA, Chi DS.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008 May; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging.
    Sohaib SA, Sahdev A, Van Trappen P, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 May; 180(5):1297-304. PubMed ID: 12704041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Multi-detector CT features of benign adnexal lesions.
    Tsili AC, Dalkalitsis N, Paraskevaidis E, Tsampoulas K.
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 19734064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
    Utrilla-Layna J, Alcázar JL, Aubá M, Laparte C, Olartecoechea B, Errasti T, Juez L, Mínguez JÁ, Guerriero S, Jurado M.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Diagnosis and Management of Adnexal Masses.
    Biggs WS, Marks ST.
    Am Fam Physician; 2016 Apr 15; 93(8):676-81. PubMed ID: 27175840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Differentiation between malignant and benign ovarian tumors by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chen M, Wang WC, Zhou C, Zhou NN, Cai K, Yang ZH, Zhao WF, Li SY, Li GZ.
    Chin Med Sci J; 2006 Dec 15; 21(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 17249204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Asymptomatic adnexal masses: correlation of FDG PET and histopathologic findings.
    Fenchel S, Grab D, Nuessle K, Kotzerke J, Rieber A, Kreienberg R, Brambs HJ, Reske SN.
    Radiology; 2002 Jun 15; 223(3):780-8. PubMed ID: 12034950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Computed tomography adnexal mass score to estimate risk for ovarian cancer.
    Santoso JT, Robinson A, Suganda S, Praservit S, Wan JY, Ueland F.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Mar 15; 289(3):595-600. PubMed ID: 23995674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
    Guerra A, Cunha TM, Félix A.
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul 15; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
    Salem S, White LM, Lai J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov 15; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Does sphere volume affect the performance of three-dimensional power Doppler virtual vascular sampling for predicting malignancy in vascularized solid or cystic-solid adnexal masses?
    Kudla MJ, Alcázar JL.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May 15; 35(5):602-8. PubMed ID: 20183808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Di Legge A, Testa AC, Ameye L, Van Calster B, Lissoni AA, Leone FP, Savelli L, Franchi D, Czekierdowski A, Trio D, Van Holsbeke C, Ferrazzi E, Scambia G, Timmerman D, Valentin L.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep 15; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
    Van Holsbeke C, Van Belle V, Leone FP, Guerriero S, Paladini D, Melis GB, Greggi S, Fischerova D, De Jonge E, Neven P, Bourne T, Valentin L, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul 15; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prediction of benignity of solid adnexal masses.
    Wang S, Johnson S.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar 15; 285(3):721-6. PubMed ID: 21858439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.
    Radosa MP, Vorwergk J, Fitzgerald J, Kaehler C, Schneider U, Camara O, Runnebaum IB, Schleußner E.
    Ultraschall Med; 2014 Aug 15; 35(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23775448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Diagnostic performance of the Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System for malignant adnexal masses.
    Zhang T, Li F, Liu J, Zhang S.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jun 15; 137(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 28295272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses.
    Sohaib SA, Mills TD, Sahdev A, Webb JA, Vantrappen PO, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH.
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Mar 15; 60(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 15710137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.