These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

288 related items for PubMed ID: 18492085

  • 1. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems.
    Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, Spüntrup E, Steiner A, Stoll C.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jul; 19(7):709-16. PubMed ID: 18492085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Jul; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template.
    Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Giansanti M, Calasso S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Jul; 27(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 22616060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Use of an image-guided navigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites.
    Siessegger M, Schneider BT, Mischkowski RA, Lazar F, Krug B, Klesper B, Zöller JE.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 29(5):276-81. PubMed ID: 11673922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Accuracy of virtually planned and conventionally placed implants in edentulous cadaver maxillae and mandibles: a preliminary report.
    Gillot L, Cannas B, Friberg B, Vrielinck L, Rohner D, Pettersson A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):798-804. PubMed ID: 24993376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Precision of implant placement with stereolithographic templates: a pilot in vitro study.
    Bilhan H, Arat S, Mumcu E, Geckili O, Sakar O.
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 21126171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 dental implant navigation systems.
    Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Schicho K, Birkfellner W, Enislidis G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Oct; 22(5):785-90. PubMed ID: 17974114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The tent pole splint: a bone-supported stereolithographic surgical splint for the soft tissue matrix expansion graft procedure.
    Cillo JE, Theodotou N, Samuels M, Krajekian J.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1365-70. PubMed ID: 20231048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.