These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
270 related items for PubMed ID: 18493688
1. [Detection of metastases in breast cancer patients: comparison of FDG PET with chest X-ray, bone scintigraphy and ultrasound of the abdomen]. Dose-Schwarz J, Mahner S, Schirrmacher S, Jenicke L, Müller V, Habermann CR, Brenner W. Nuklearmedizin; 2008; 47(3):97-103. PubMed ID: 18493688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and "conventional diagnostic procedures" for the detection of distant metastases in breast cancer patients. Dose J, Bleckmann C, Bachmann S, Bohuslavizki KH, Berger J, Jenicke L, Habermann CR, Jãnicke F. Nucl Med Commun; 2002 Sep; 23(9):857-64. PubMed ID: 12195090 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for staging locally advanced breast cancer: A prospective study from a tertiary cancer centre in south India. Gajjala SR, Hulikal N, Kadiyala S, Kottu R, Kalawat T. Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 29923514 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in initial staging of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma with an emphasis on M staging. Mittal BR, Manohar K, Kashyap R, Bhattacharya A, Singh B, Singh G. Hell J Nucl Med; 2011 Mar; 14(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 21761015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer: comparison to conventional staging. Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Delord M, Hindié E, Vercellino L, Cuvier C, Toubert ME, Merlet P, Hennequin C, Espié M. J Nucl Med; 2013 Jan; 54(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 23213197 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer. Lind P, Igerc I, Beyer T, Reinprecht P, Hausegger K. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():S125-34. PubMed ID: 15085295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods. Kresnik E, Mikosch P, Gallowitsch HJ, Kogler D, Wiesser S, Heinisch M, Unterweger O, Raunik W, Kumnig G, Gomez I, Grünbacher G, Lind P. Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 28(7):816-21. PubMed ID: 11504077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in identifying distant metastatic disease missed by conventional imaging in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Manohar K, Mittal BR, Bhoil A, Bhattacharya A, Singh G. Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Jun; 34(6):557-61. PubMed ID: 23549551 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]