These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

708 related items for PubMed ID: 18496341

  • 1. Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis.
    Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Riew KD.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May 20; 33(12):1305-12. PubMed ID: 18496341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
    Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec 15; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Sasso RC, Best NM, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug 15; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow-up.
    Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Oct 15; 20(7):481-91. PubMed ID: 17912124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep 21; 93(18):1684-92. PubMed ID: 21938372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Clinical outcomes of single level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective controlled study].
    Wang Y, Cai B, Zhang XS, Xiao SH, Wang Z, Lu N, Chai W, Zheng GQ.
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar 01; 46(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 18785525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, Woo Kim S, Cappuccino A, Pimenta L.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion. A prospective multicenter study.
    An HS, Simpson JM, Glover JM, Stephany J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Oct 15; 20(20):2211-6. PubMed ID: 8545714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Lower incidence of dysphagia with cervical arthroplasty compared with ACDF in a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW, Devine JG, Phillips FM, Regan JJ, Albert TJ, Ahrens JE.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Feb 15; 23(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 20051917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article.
    Coric D, Cassis J, Carew JD, Boltes MO.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec 15; 13(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 21121748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of retraction pressure during anterior cervical plate surgery and cervical disc replacement: a cadaveric study.
    Tortolani PJ, Cunningham BW, Vigna F, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jul 15; 19(5):312-7. PubMed ID: 16826000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.
    Singh K, Phillips FM, Park DK, Pelton MA, An HS, Goldberg EJ.
    Spine J; 2012 May 15; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22425784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging clarity of the Bryan, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervical arthroplasty devices.
    Sekhon LH, Duggal N, Lynch JJ, Haid RW, Heller JG, Riew KD, Seex K, Anderson PA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar 15; 32(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 17413473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Re: Sasso R, Heller J, Hacker B, Smucker J. Artificial disc versus fusion. A prospective, randomized study with 2-years follow-up on 99 patients. Spine 2007;32:2933-40.
    Botelho RV.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May 01; 33(10):1156-7; author reply 1157. PubMed ID: 18449052
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 36.