These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 18497209

  • 1. Interproximal caries detection: how good are we?
    Dykstra B.
    Dent Today; 2008 Apr; 27(4):144, 146-7. PubMed ID: 18497209
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pitfalls in radiographic interpretation, Part 1.
    Serman N, Singer S.
    Dent Today; 2000 May; 19(5):100-5. PubMed ID: 12524768
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries.
    White SC, Hollender L, Gratt BM.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 108(5):755-9. PubMed ID: 6588117
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Utility and effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis of dental caries.
    Tracy KD, Dykstra BA, Gakenheimer DC, Scheetz JP, Lacina S, Scarfe WC, Farman AG.
    Gen Dent; 2011 May; 59(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 21903524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reliability of Logicon caries detector in the detection and depth assessment of dental caries: an in-vitro study.
    Behere RR, Lele SM.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Mar; 22(2):362. PubMed ID: 21891917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Digital imaging for dental caries.
    Wenzel A.
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):319-38, vi. PubMed ID: 10740771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Kang B-C, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Goldsmith LJ.
    Caries Res; 1996 Apr; 30(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 8833141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.