These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
261 related items for PubMed ID: 18503895
1. Randomized, multicenter study comparing expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered endoprosthesis placement with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. Saxon RR, Dake MD, Volgelzang RL, Katzen BT, Becker GJ. J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):823-32. PubMed ID: 18503895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Four-year randomized prospective comparison of percutaneous ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft versus prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. McQuade K, Gable D, Pearl G, Theune B, Black S. J Vasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 52(3):584-90; discussion 590-1, 591.e1-591.e7. PubMed ID: 20598480 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Heparin-bonded covered stents versus bare-metal stents for complex femoropopliteal artery lesions: the randomized VIASTAR trial (Viabahn endoprosthesis with PROPATEN bioactive surface [VIA] versus bare nitinol stent in the treatment of long lesions in superficial femoral artery occlusive disease). Lammer J, Zeller T, Hausegger KA, Schaefer PJ, Gschwendtner M, Mueller-Huelsbeck S, Rand T, Funovics M, Wolf F, Rastan A, Gschwandtner M, Puchner S, Ristl R, Schoder M. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct 08; 62(15):1320-7. PubMed ID: 23831445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized comparison of ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft vs prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. McQuade K, Gable D, Hohman S, Pearl G, Theune B. J Vasc Surg; 2009 Jan 08; 49(1):109-15, 116.e1-9; discussion 116. PubMed ID: 19028055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term results of ePTFE stent-graft versus angioplasty in the femoropopliteal artery: single center experience from a prospective, randomized trial. Saxon RR, Coffman JM, Gooding JM, Natuzzi E, Ponec DJ. J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Mar 08; 14(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 12631634 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Balloon angioplasty versus stenting with nitinol stents in intermediate length superficial femoral artery lesions. Dick P, Wallner H, Sabeti S, Loewe C, Mlekusch W, Lammer J, Koppensteiner R, Minar E, Schillinger M. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec 01; 74(7):1090-5. PubMed ID: 19859954 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Superiority of stent-grafts for in-stent restenosis in the superficial femoral artery: twelve-month results from a multicenter randomized trial. Bosiers M, Deloose K, Callaert J, Verbist J, Hendriks J, Lauwers P, Schroë H, Lansink W, Scheinert D, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Beschorner U, Noory E, Torsello G, Austermann M, Peeters P. J Endovasc Ther; 2015 Feb 01; 22(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25775672 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stent placement versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Rastan A, Krankenberg H, Baumgartner I, Blessing E, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Pilger E, Scheinert D, Lammer J, Gißler M, Noory E, Neumann FJ, Zeller T. Circulation; 2013 Jun 25; 127(25):2535-41. PubMed ID: 23694965 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of SMART stent placement for arteriovenous graft salvage versus successful graft PTA. Vogel PM, Parise C. J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Dec 25; 16(12):1619-26. PubMed ID: 16371528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A Prospective, Randomized Study of an Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Stent Graft versus Balloon Angioplasty for In-Stent Restenosis in Arteriovenous Grafts and Fistulae: Two-Year Results of the RESCUE Study. Falk A, Maya ID, Yevzlin AS, RESCUE Investigators. J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Oct 25; 27(10):1465-76. PubMed ID: 27514445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]