These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
129 related items for PubMed ID: 18505327
1. Effects of a moving distractor object on time-to-contact judgments. Oberfeld D, Hecht H. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):605-23. PubMed ID: 18505327 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Time-to-contact judgments of an approaching object that is partially concealed by an occluder. DeLucia PR. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 15053689 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal-range estimation of multiple objects: evidence for an early bottleneck. Baurès R, Oberfeld D, Hecht H. Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21440884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Judging the contact-times of multiple objects: Evidence for asymmetric interference. Baurès R, Oberfeld D, Hecht H. Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 20423735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of optic expansion rates when judging the relative time to contact of familiar objects. Hosking SG, Crassini B. J Vis; 2011 May 31; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21628397 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention? Munneke J, Van der Stigchel S, Theeuwes J. Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep 31; 129(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18589391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Early and late modulation of saccade deviations by target distractor similarity. Mulckhuyse M, Van der Stigchel S, Theeuwes J. J Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep 31; 102(3):1451-8. PubMed ID: 19553494 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A new response-time measure of object persistence in the tunnel effect. Kawachi Y, Gyoba J. Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Sep 31; 123(1-2):73-90. PubMed ID: 16777044 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Information integration in judgements of time to contact. DeLucia P, Kaiser M, Bush J, Meyer L, Sweet B. Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Oct 31; 56(7):1165-89. PubMed ID: 12959909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. When does visual attention select all features of a distractor? Chen Z, Cave KR. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec 31; 32(6):1452-64. PubMed ID: 17154784 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Aging and the detection of observer and moving object collisions. Andersen GJ, Enriquez A. Psychol Aging; 2006 Mar 31; 21(1):74-85. PubMed ID: 16594793 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects? Ellis R, Tucker M, Symes E, Vainio L. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun 31; 33(3):670-91. PubMed ID: 17563229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Anticipating the effects of gravity when intercepting moving objects: differentiating up and down based on nonvisual cues. Senot P, Zago M, Lacquaniti F, McIntyre J. J Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec 31; 94(6):4471-80. PubMed ID: 16120661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gaze perception requires focused attention: evidence from an interference task. Burton AM, Bindemann M, Langton SR, Schweinberger SR, Jenkins R. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb 31; 35(1):108-18. PubMed ID: 19170474 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: the role of visual memory. Narasimhan S, Tripathy SP, Barrett BT. Vision Res; 2009 Jan 31; 49(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 18930074 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]