These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

286 related items for PubMed ID: 18506961

  • 1. [Radiologic exposure of the dental patient: comparison of the doses delivered by different techniques].
    Jones P, Reychler H, Engels H, Wambersie A.
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 18506961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
    Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD, Geibel MA.
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996 Aug; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reduction of absorbed doses to the thyroid gland in orthodontic treatment planning by reducing the area of irradiation.
    Svenson B, Sjöholm B, Jonsson B.
    Swed Dent J; 2004 Aug; 28(3):137-47. PubMed ID: 15506691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Review article: radiation protection in dental radiology.
    Horner K.
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Nov; 67(803):1041-9. PubMed ID: 7820393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Dose reduction by direct-digital cephalometric radiography.
    Visser H, Rödig T, Hermann KP.
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 11407766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C, Thilander-Klang A, Ylhan B, Lofthag-Hansen S, Ekestubbe A.
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
    Wrzesień M, Olszewski J.
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul 17; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effectiveness of the thyroid shield in dental radiology.
    Sikorski PA, Taylor KW.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Aug 17; 58(2):225-36. PubMed ID: 6592516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Absorbed radiation dose during lateral cephalometric radiography: comparison of screen-film systems and field-size combinations.
    Tsiklakis K, Donta-Bakoyanni C, Tassopoulou M, Kamenopoulou V.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000 Aug 17; 24(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 11314319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y, Kobayashi N, Kuroyanagi K, Nishizawa K.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep 17; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.