These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Validation of environmental transfer models and assessment of the effectiveness of countermeasures using data on (131)I releases from Chernobyl. Krajewski P, Ammann M, Bartusková M, Duffa C, Filistovic V, Homma T, Kanyár B, Malátová I, Nedveckaite T, Simon S, Vlasov O, Webbe-Wood D, Zvonova I. Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1730-5. PubMed ID: 18541435 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Modelling of a large-scale urban contamination situation and remediation alternatives. Thiessen KM, Arkhipov A, Batandjieva B, Charnock TW, Gaschak S, Golikov V, Hwang WT, Tomás J, Zlobenko B. J Environ Radioact; 2009 May; 100(5):413-21. PubMed ID: 19324477 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Modelling the long-term consequences of a hypothetical dispersal of radioactivity in an urban area including remediation alternatives. Thiessen KM, Andersson KG, Batandjieva B, Cheng JJ, Hwang WT, Kaiser JC, Kamboj S, Steiner M, Tomás J, Trifunovic D, Yu C. J Environ Radioact; 2009 Jun; 100(6):445-55. PubMed ID: 19362757 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Studies on the current 137Cs body burden of children in Belarus--can the dose be further reduced? Hill P, Schläger M, Vogel V, Hille R, Nesterenko AV, Nesterenko VB. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007 Jun; 125(1-4):523-6. PubMed ID: 17314090 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. International study on the validation of models for the environmental transfer of tritium and carbon-14. Yankovich TL, Koarashi J, Kim SB, Davis PA. Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1726-9. PubMed ID: 18667321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach. Sullivan T, Musolino SV, DeFranco J. Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IDEAS internal contamination database: a compilation of published internal contamination cases. A tool for the internal dosimetry community. Hurtgen C, Andrasi A, Bailey M, Blanchardon E, Berkovski V, Castellani CM, Doerfel H, Jourdain JR, LeGuen B, Malatova I, Marsh J, Puncher M. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007 May; 125(1-4):520-2. PubMed ID: 17012307 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An operational approach for aircraft crew dosimetry: the SIEVERT system. Bottollier-Depois JF, Blanchard P, Clairand I, Dessarps P, Fuller N, Lantos P, Saint-Lô D, Trompier F. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007 May; 125(1-4):421-4. PubMed ID: 17711868 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling of the EMRAS urban working group hypothetical scenario using the RESRAD-RDD methodology. Kamboj S, Cheng JJ, Yu C, Domotor S, Wallo A. J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1012-8. PubMed ID: 19403213 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The quantification of uncertainties in internal doses assessed from monitoring measurements. Etherington G. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007 Dec; 125(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17237184 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical implications of procedures developed in IDEA project--comparison with traditional methods. Andrasi A, Bouvier C, Brandl A, de Carlan L, Fischer H, Franck D, Höllriegl V, Li WB, Oeh U, Ritt J, Roth P, Schlagbauer M, Schmitzer Ch, Wahl W, Zombori P. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007 Dec; 125(1-4):456-9. PubMed ID: 17314089 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Modelling remediation options for urban contamination situations. Thiessen KM, Andersson KG, Charnock TW, Gallay F. J Environ Radioact; 2009 Jul; 100(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19427718 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits. van Rongen E, Saunders RD, van Deventer ET, Repacholi MH. Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty. Christ A. Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncertainties in determination of 131I activity in thyroid gland. Ośko J, Golnik N, Pliszczynski T. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007 Jun; 125(1-4):516-9. PubMed ID: 17309877 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of the uncertainty in internal dose calculation for two contamination cases. Blanchardon E, Molokanov A, Franck D, Kochetkov O, Panfilov A, Jourdain JR. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007 Jun; 125(1-4):548-52. PubMed ID: 17237182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the uncertainty in internal dose estimate resulting from biological stochastic variability of excretion. Molokanov A, Blanchardon E. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007 Jun; 125(1-4):561-4. PubMed ID: 17848381 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]