These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion]. Sendtner E, Müller M, Winkler R, Wörner M, Grifka J, Renkawitz T. Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. Yoshimine F. J Biomech; 2006 Mar; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of surgical experience on accuracy of acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Reize P, Geiger EV, Suckel A, Rudert M, Wülker N. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Jul; 37(7):360-3. PubMed ID: 18795183 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Accuracy improvement of acetabular component placement using non-image based surgical navigation system]. Yu Z, Wang L, Gui J. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1057-61. PubMed ID: 17990769 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Widmer KH, Majewski M. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Components anteversion in primary cementless THA using straight stem and hemispherical cup: a prospective study in 91 hips using CT-scan measurements. Reikerås O, Gunderson RB. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Oct; 97(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 21889919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. Merle C, Grammatopoulos G, Waldstein W, Pegg E, Pandit H, Aldinger PR, Gill HS, Murray DW. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov 20; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Femoral anteversion in THA and its lack of correlation with native acetabular anteversion. Bargar WL, Jamali AA, Nejad AH. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb 20; 468(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 19714389 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Abdel MP, von Roth P, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb 20; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Using intraoperative pelvic landmarks for acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty. Sotereanos NG, Miller MC, Smith B, Hube R, Sewecke JJ, Wohlrab D. J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep 20; 21(6):832-40. PubMed ID: 16950035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur. Miki H, Sugano N. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2011 Nov 20; 26(9):944-9. PubMed ID: 21680069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion. Girard J, Krantz N, Bocquet D, Wavreille G, Migaud H. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Feb 20; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Acetabular alignment and primary arc of motion for minus, skirtless, and skirted 28-, 32-, 36-, and 40-mm femoral heads. Kosashvili Y, Omoto D, Backstein D, Safir O, Lakstein D, Gross AE. J Arthroplasty; 2013 Feb 20; 28(2):279-285.e2. PubMed ID: 22854347 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion. Haaker RG, Tiedjen K, Ottersbach A, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M, Stiehl JB. J Arthroplasty; 2007 Feb 20; 22(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 17275626 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]