These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

253 related items for PubMed ID: 18534546

  • 1. An in vivo model for intraoperative assessment of impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty.
    Tanino H, Ito H, Harman MK, Matsuno T, Hodge WA, Banks SA.
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 18534546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system.
    Miki H, Yamanashi W, Nishii T, Sato Y, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N.
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):946-52. PubMed ID: 17920464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion].
    Sendtner E, Müller M, Winkler R, Wörner M, Grifka J, Renkawitz T.
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Method for the evaluation of factors influencing the dislocation stability of total hip endoprotheses].
    Bader R, Scholz R, Steinhauser E, Busch R, Mittelmeier W.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 May; 49(5):137-44. PubMed ID: 15212199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
    Higa M, Tanino H, Abo M, Kakunai S, Banks SA.
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun 03; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty.
    Glaser D, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Miner TM.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Feb 03; 23(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 18022739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Which procedure better restores intact hip range of motion: total hip arthroplasty or resurfacing? A combined cadaveric and computer simulation study.
    Incavo SJ, Thompson MT, Gold JE, Patel RV, Icenogle KD, Noble PC.
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr 03; 26(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 20378308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Matsushita A, Nakashima Y, Jingushi S, Yamamoto T, Kuraoka A, Iwamoto Y.
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun 03; 24(4):646-51. PubMed ID: 18534445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A computer model of the position of the combined component in the prevention of impingement in total hip replacement.
    Barsoum WK, Patterson RW, Higuera C, Klika AK, Krebs VE, Molloy R.
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jun 03; 89(6):839-45. PubMed ID: 17613516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.
    Seki M, Yuasa N, Ohkuni K.
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul 03; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
    Yoshimine F.
    J Biomech; 2006 Jul 03; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of the unstable total hip arthroplasty.
    Hamilton WG, McAuley JP.
    Instr Course Lect; 2004 Jul 03; 53():87-92. PubMed ID: 15116602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Analytical computational model for the determination of the influence of design and surgical factors on the range of motion of total hip replacements].
    Kliewe C, Souffrant R, Kluess D, Woernle C, Brökel K, Bader R.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Feb 03; 55(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 20128745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.