These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

251 related items for PubMed ID: 18540016

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Angelieri F, Almeida RR, Almeida MR, Fuziy A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Correction of deep overbite and gummy smile by using a mini-implant with a segmented wire in a growing Class II Division 2 patient.
    Kim TW, Kim H, Lee SJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):676-85. PubMed ID: 17110268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH, Sellke TA, BeGole EA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The effects of the pendulum distalising appliance and cervical headgear on the dentofacial structures.
    Toy E, Enacar A.
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 May; 27(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 21696108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M, Torget O, Vandevska-Radunovic V.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Effectiveness of 3 methods of anchorage reinforcement for maximum anchorage in adolescents: A 3-arm multicenter randomized clinical trial.
    Sandler J, Murray A, Thiruvenkatachari B, Gutierrez R, Speight P, O'Brien K.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 24974994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible.
    Du X, Hägg U, Rabie AB.
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Apr; 24(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 12001553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The role of cervical headgear and lower utility arch in the control of the vertical dimension.
    Ulger G, Arun T, Sayinsu K, Isik F.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):492-501. PubMed ID: 17045149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C, Sahinoğlu Z, Özçirpici AA, Uçkan S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H, Sayin MO.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.