These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

457 related items for PubMed ID: 18545213

  • 1. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C, Riss D, Kaider A, Mair A, Wagenblast J, Baumgartner WD, Gstöttner W, Hamzavi JS.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients.
    Arnoldner C, Kaider A, Hamzavi J.
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1760-5. PubMed ID: 17003738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Chen JK, Chuang AY, McMahon C, Hsieh JC, Tung TH, Li LP.
    Pediatrics; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e793-800. PubMed ID: 20211951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Hildesheimer M, Muchnik C.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA, Litvak LM, Hughes ML.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparison of the speech recognition and pitch ranking abilities of children using a unilateral cochlear implant, bimodal stimulation or bilateral hearing aids.
    Looi V, Radford CJ.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 75(4):472-82. PubMed ID: 21300411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation "20 + 2" implant: bipolar versus monopolar activation.
    Zwolan TA, Kileny PR, Ashbaugh C, Telian SA.
    Am J Otol; 1996 Sep; 17(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 8892567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
    Snel-Bongers J, Briaire JJ, Vanpoucke FJ, Frijns JH.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Sep; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of fine structure and extended low frequencies in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.
    Riss D, Hamzavi JS, Katzinger M, Baumgartner WD, Kaider A, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 75(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 21324531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Hearing results with deep insertion of cochlear implant electrodes.
    Hodges AV, Villasuso E, Balkany T, Bird PA, Butts S, Lee D, Gomez O.
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 9918173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS, Throckmorton CS, Collins LM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ, Connell SS, Hodges AV, Payne SL, Telischi FF, Eshraghi AA, Angeli SI, Germani R, Messiah S, Arheart KL.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Audiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant.
    Otto SR, Shannon RV, Wilkinson EP, Hitselberger WE, McCreery DB, Moore JK, Brackmann DE.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1147-54. PubMed ID: 18931643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA, Battmer RD, Pesch J.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Niewiarowicz M, Stieler O.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005 Jun; 126(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16180345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width.
    Aronson L, Rosenhouse J, Podoshin L, Rosenhouse G, Zanutto SB.
    Med Prog Technol; 1994 Jun; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cochlear implants with fine structure processing improve speech and tone perception in Mandarin-speaking adults.
    Chen X, Liu B, Liu S, Mo L, Li Y, Kong Y, Zheng J, Li Y, Gong S, Han D.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 133(7):733-8. PubMed ID: 23768059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U, Rader T, Helbig S, Bahmer A.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jul; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.