These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

295 related items for PubMed ID: 18552677

  • 1. Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Carragee E, Carrino JA, Kaiser J, Sequeiros RT, Lecomte AR, Grove MR, Blood EA, Pearson LH, Weinstein JN, Herzog R.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun 15; 33(14):1605-10. PubMed ID: 18552677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging readings for lumbar disc herniation in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).
    Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Carragee E, Carrino JA, Kaiser J, Sequeiros RT, Lecomte AR, Grove MR, Blood EA, Pearson LH, Herzog R, Weinstein JN.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr 20; 33(9):991-8. PubMed ID: 18427321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Verification of measurements of lumbar spinal dimensions in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences.
    Cheung JP, Shigematsu H, Cheung KM.
    Spine J; 2014 Aug 01; 14(8):1476-83. PubMed ID: 24314906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: intra- and inter-reader agreement for magnetic resonance imaging parameters.
    Winklhofer S, Held U, Burgstaller JM, Finkenstaedt T, Bolog N, Ulrich N, Steurer J, Andreisek G, Del Grande F.
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb 01; 26(2):353-361. PubMed ID: 27334492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Qualitative versus quantitative lumbar spinal stenosis grading by machine learning supported texture analysis-Experience from the LSOS study cohort.
    Huber FA, Stutz S, Vittoria de Martini I, Mannil M, Becker AS, Winklhofer S, Burgstaller JM, Guggenberger R.
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May 01; 114():45-50. PubMed ID: 31005175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
    Singh K, Samartzis D, Vaccaro AR, Nassr A, Andersson GB, Yoon ST, Phillips FM, Goldberg EJ, An HS.
    Spine J; 2005 May 01; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reliability of standing weight-bearing (0.25T) MR imaging findings and positional changes in the lumbar spine.
    Hansen BB, Hansen P, Christensen AF, Trampedach C, Rasti Z, Bliddal H, Boesen M.
    Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jan 01; 47(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 28812185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
    Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, Kim KJ, Kim HJ, Chung SK, Kang HS.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr 01; 194(4):1095-8. PubMed ID: 20308517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for assessing central lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee YJ, Lee SY, Park NH, Choi YJ, Chung EC, Rho MH.
    Br J Radiol; 2013 May 01; 86(1025):20120180. PubMed ID: 23426848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.