These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
353 related items for PubMed ID: 18565094
1. Comparison of rebound and applanation tonometry in the management of patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Rehnman JB, Martin L. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 18565094 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting. Kim KN, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Yang MK, Kim DM. Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists. Abraham LM, Epasinghe NC, Selva D, Casson R. Eye (Lond); 2008 Apr; 22(4):503-6. PubMed ID: 17159973 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Salim S, Du H, Wan J. J Glaucoma; 2013 Apr; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by non-contact air puff versus Goldmann applanation tonometers in gas-filled vitrectomized eyes. Patikulsila D, Taweemankongsab S, Ngamtipakorn S. J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 May; 86(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12859105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma. Sullivan-Mee M, Halverson KD, Qualls C. J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Fernandes P, Díaz-Rey JA, Queirós A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Jorge J. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, Fernandez-Vidal A, Benitez del Castillo JM, Wasfi M, Garcia-Sanchez J. Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability. Tonnu PA, Ho T, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C, Garway-Heath D. Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):847-50. PubMed ID: 15965164 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Jimenez-Santos M, Saenz-Frances F, Matilla-Rodero M, Mendez-Hernandez C, Herrero-Vanrell R, Garcia-Feijoo J. Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]