These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
210 related items for PubMed ID: 18571696
21. [Role of osteoporosis in trauma diagnostics]. Bitterling H, Vogel T, Dobler T, Mutschler W, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser M, Eibel R. Rofo; 2005 Dec; 177(12):1663-9. PubMed ID: 16333789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Dec; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis. Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Feb; 16(2):406-16. PubMed ID: 11204441 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Bone density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in Qatari women. Hammoudeh M, Al-Khayarin M, Zirie M, Bener A. Maturitas; 2005 Feb; 52(3-4):319-27. PubMed ID: 15994035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss. Nguyen TV, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA. J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density in Thai women using the Osteosys Dexxum T-bone densitometer. Pongchaiyakul C, Kotruchin P. J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Aug; 96(8):898-904. PubMed ID: 23991594 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture. Yamada M, Ito M, Hayashi K, Ohki M, Nakamura T. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry. El-Desouki MI, Sherafzal MS, Othman SA. Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Bone Mineral Density T-Scores Derived from CT Attenuation Numbers (Hounsfield Units): Clinical Utility and Correlation with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Hendrickson NR, Pickhardt PJ, Del Rio AM, Rosas HG, Anderson PA. Iowa Orthop J; 2018 Sep; 38():25-31. PubMed ID: 30104921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Common errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans in imaging centers in Ecuador. Maldonado G, Intriago M, Larroude M, Aguilar G, Moreno M, Gonzalez J, Vargas S, Vera C, Rios K, Rios C. Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jan 02; 15(1):6. PubMed ID: 31897808 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Variation in bone mineral density by anatomical site in patients with proximal humeral fractures. Wilson J, Bonner TJ, Head M, Fordham J, Brealey S, Rangan A. J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jun 02; 91(6):772-5. PubMed ID: 19483231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Bilateral femoral bone mineral density measurements in Chinese women and men. Xu H, Gong J, Chen JX, Zhang TM, Wu QL. J Clin Densitom; 2007 Jun 02; 10(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 17485033 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice. El Maghraoui A, Do Santos Zounon AA, Jroundi I, Nouijai A, Ghazi M, Achemlal L, Bezza A, Tazi MA, Abouqual R. Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec 02; 16(12):1742-8. PubMed ID: 15937633 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Site-specific variation in the classification of osteoporosis, and the diagnostic reclassification using the lowest individual lumbar vertebra T-score compared with the L1-L4 mean, in early postmenopausal women. Sahota O, Pearson D, Cawte SW, San P, Hosking DJ. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Dec 02; 11(10):852-7. PubMed ID: 11199189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Posterior-anterior and lateral dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of vertebral osteoporosis and bone loss among older men. Zmuda JM, Cauley JA, Glynn NW, Finkelstein JS. J Bone Miner Res; 2000 Jul 02; 15(7):1417-24. PubMed ID: 10893693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Interest of a prescreening questionnaire to reduce the cost of bone densitometry. Ben Sedrine W, Broers P, Devogelaer JP, Depresseux G, Kaufman JM, Goemaere S, Reginster JY. Osteoporos Int; 2002 May 02; 13(5):434-42. PubMed ID: 12086356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Radiographic absorptiometry as a screening tool in male osteoporosis: results from the Odense Androgen Study. Hansen SJ, Nielsen MM, Ryg J, Wraae K, Andersen M, Brixen K. Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul 02; 50(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 19488892 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical utility of spine bone density in elderly women. Schneider DL, Bettencourt R, Barrett-Connor E. J Clin Densitom; 2006 Jul 02; 9(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 16931341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system. Blake GM, Knapp KM, Fogelman I. Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb 02; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Discordance Between Hip and Spinal Bone Mineral Density Among Saudi Subjects. Al Zaid H, Alamri MS, AlOfair AA, Alqusaiyer FS, Alorainey AI, Alasqah MI, Sulimani RA. Cureus; 2022 Aug 02; 14(8):e27684. PubMed ID: 36072162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]