These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

421 related items for PubMed ID: 18573590

  • 1. Comparison of two intraosseous infusion systems for adult emergency medical use.
    Brenner T, Bernhard M, Helm M, Doll S, Völkl A, Ganion N, Friedmann C, Sikinger M, Knapp J, Martin E, Gries A.
    Resuscitation; 2008 Sep; 78(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 18573590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of two mechanical intraosseous infusion devices: a pilot, randomized crossover trial.
    Shavit I, Hoffmann Y, Galbraith R, Waisman Y.
    Resuscitation; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1029-33. PubMed ID: 19586701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of the Fluid Resuscitation Rate with and without External Pressure Using Two Intraosseous Infusion Systems for Adult Emergencies, the CITRIN (Comparison of InTRaosseous infusion systems in emergency medicINe)-Study.
    Hammer N, Möbius R, Gries A, Hossfeld B, Bechmann I, Bernhard M.
    PLoS One; 2015 Sep; 10(12):e0143726. PubMed ID: 26630579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of two intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department: A prospective, randomized study.
    Leidel BA, Kirchhoff C, Braunstein V, Bogner V, Biberthaler P, Kanz KG.
    Resuscitation; 2010 Aug; 81(8):994-9. PubMed ID: 20434823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Consecutive field trials using two different intraosseous devices.
    Frascone RJ, Jensen JP, Kaye K, Salzman JG.
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007 Aug; 11(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 17454802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of intravenous and intraosseous access by pre-hospital medical emergency personnel with and without CBRN protective equipment.
    Lamhaut L, Dagron C, Apriotesei R, Gouvernaire J, Elie C, Marx JS, Télion C, Vivien B, Carli P.
    Resuscitation; 2010 Jan; 81(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 19854554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. IO versus IV access while wearing personal protective equipment in a HazMat scenario.
    Suyama J, Knutsen CC, Northington WE, Hahn M, Hostler D.
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007 Jan; 11(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 17907035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service.
    Helm M, Haunstein B, Schlechtriemen T, Ruppert M, Lampl L, Gäßler M.
    Resuscitation; 2015 Mar; 88():43-7. PubMed ID: 25553609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of four different intraosseous access devices during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A randomized crossover manikin trial.
    Bielski K, Szarpak L, Smereka J, Ladny JR, Leung S, Ruetzler K.
    Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jul; 176(7):865-871. PubMed ID: 28500463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Use of a battery-operated needle driver for intraosseous access by novice users: skill acquisition with cadavers.
    Levitan RM, Bortle CD, Snyder TA, Nitsch DA, Pisaturo JT, Butler KH.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Nov; 54(5):692-4. PubMed ID: 19643511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Military Medic Performance with Employment of a Commercial Intraosseous Infusion Device: A Randomized, Crossover Study.
    Gendron B, Cronin A, Monti J, Brigg A.
    Mil Med; 2018 May 01; 183(5-6):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 29420766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Powered intraosseous insertion provides safe and effective vascular access for pediatric emergency patients.
    Horton MA, Beamer C.
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2008 Jun 01; 24(6):347-50. PubMed ID: 18562874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in a pre-hospital emergency service: A prospective study and review of the literature.
    Santos D, Carron PN, Yersin B, Pasquier M.
    Resuscitation; 2013 Apr 01; 84(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 23160104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intraosseous devices: a randomized controlled trial comparing three intraosseous devices.
    Hartholt KA, van Lieshout EM, Thies WC, Patka P, Schipper IB.
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2010 Apr 01; 14(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 19947861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intraosseous access in the prehospital setting: literature review.
    Olaussen A, Williams B.
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2012 Oct 01; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 22877834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency department with inaccessible peripheral veins.
    Leidel BA, Kirchhoff C, Bogner V, Braunstein V, Biberthaler P, Kanz KG.
    Resuscitation; 2012 Jan 01; 83(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 21893125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Paramedics successfully perform humeral EZ-IO intraosseous access in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
    Wampler D, Schwartz D, Shumaker J, Bolleter S, Beckett R, Manifold C.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Sep 01; 30(7):1095-9. PubMed ID: 22030185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.