These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

288 related items for PubMed ID: 18581404

  • 1. Detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and uterine cancers by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
    Lin G, Ho KC, Wang JJ, Ng KK, Wai YY, Chen YT, Chang CJ, Ng SH, Lai CH, Yen TC.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jul; 28(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 18581404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: early experience.
    Kim JK, Kim KA, Park BW, Kim N, Cho KS.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):714-9. PubMed ID: 18777531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones.
    Kilickesmez O, Bayramoglu S, Inci E, Cimilli T, Kayhan A.
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19235579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Detection and evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with gynecologic malignancies using body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nakai G, Matsuki M, Inada Y, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M, Narabayashi I, Yamada T.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008 Apr; 32(5):764-8. PubMed ID: 18830107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Relative apparent diffusion coefficient: determination of reference site and validation of benefit for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in uterine cervical cancer.
    Park SO, Kim JK, Kim KA, Park BW, Kim N, Cho G, Choi HJ, Cho KS.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):383-90. PubMed ID: 19161191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chen YB, Hu CM, Chen GL, Hu D, Liao J.
    Abdom Imaging; 2011 Oct; 36(5):619-26. PubMed ID: 20730423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of uterine cervical cancer.
    Liu Y, Bai R, Sun H, Liu H, Wang D.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 Oct; 33(6):858-62. PubMed ID: 19940650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison between malignant and benign abdominal lymph nodes on diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Akduman EI, Momtahen AJ, Balci NC, Mahajann N, Havlioglu N, Wolverson MK.
    Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):641-6. PubMed ID: 18423322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mediastinal lymph nodes: assessment with diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
    Koşucu P, Tekinbaş C, Erol M, Sari A, Kavgaci H, Oztuna F, Ersöz S.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Aug; 30(2):292-7. PubMed ID: 19629990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Diffusion weighted imaging features of normal uterine cervix and cervical carcinoma].
    Zhang Y, Liang BL, Gao L, Ye RX, Shen J, Zhong JL.
    Ai Zheng; 2007 May; 26(5):508-12. PubMed ID: 17672942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T for differentiation of malignant and benign tissue in transition and peripheral zones: preliminary results.
    Kim CK, Park BK, Han JJ, Kang TW, Lee HM.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007 May; 31(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 17538295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The value of 3.0Tesla diffusion-weighted MRI for pelvic nodal staging in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
    Klerkx WM, Veldhuis WB, Spijkerboer AM, van den Bosch MA, Mali WP, Heintz AP, Bipat S, Sie-Go DM, van der Velden J, Schreuder HW, Stoker J, Peeters PH.
    Eur J Cancer; 2012 Dec; 48(18):3414-21. PubMed ID: 22835781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Diagnosis value of 3.0 T diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression magnetic resonance for metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer].
    Zhuang XZ, Yu SP, Cui J, Chen CQ, Zhao XJ, Pan BT, Li ZP.
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 14(11):842-5. PubMed ID: 22116716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Apparent diffusion coefficient values of necrotic and solid portion of lymph nodes: differential diagnostic value in cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Zhang Y, Chen J, Shen J, Zhong J, Ye R, Liang B.
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 22316593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in uterine cervical cancer: usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis with comprehensive evaluation of MR images and clinical findings.
    Kim MH, Kim JK, Lee Y, Park BW, Lee CK, Kim N, Cho G, Choi HJ, Cho KS.
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec 01; 52(10):1175-83. PubMed ID: 21969698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Differential diagnosis of metastasis from non-metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancers: pilot study of diffusion weighted imaging with background suppression at 3T magnetic resonance.
    Yu SP, He L, Liu B, Zhuang XZ, Liu MJ, Hu XS.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Oct 01; 123(20):2820-4. PubMed ID: 21034590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.