These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

852 related items for PubMed ID: 18582149

  • 1. Radial secondary electron dose profiles and biological effects in light-ion beams based on analytical and Monte Carlo calculations using distorted wave cross sections.
    Wiklund K, Olivera GH, Brahme A, Lind BK.
    Radiat Res; 2008 Jul; 170(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 18582149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dual scattering foil design for poly-energetic electron beams.
    Kainz KK, Antolak JA, Almond PR, Bloch CD, Hogstrom KR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar 07; 50(5):755-67. PubMed ID: 15798252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An analytical model for light ion pencil beam dose distributions: multiple scattering of primary and secondary ions.
    Hollmark M, Gudowska I, Belkić Dz, Brahme A, Sobolevsky N.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul 07; 53(13):3477-91. PubMed ID: 18547916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].
    Treutwein M, Bogner L.
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug 07; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Ding GX, Cygler JE, Yu CW, Kalach NI, Daskalov G.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct 01; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A Monte Carlo evaluation of carbon and lithium ions dose distributions in water.
    Taleei R, Hultqvist M, Gudowska I, Nikjoo H.
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan 01; 88(1-2):189-94. PubMed ID: 21929295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. PET monitoring of cancer therapy with 3He and 12C beams: a study with the GEANT4 toolkit.
    Pshenichnov I, Larionov A, Mishustin I, Greiner W.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec 21; 52(24):7295-312. PubMed ID: 18065840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Very high-energy electron dose calculation using the Fermi-Eyges theory of multiple scattering and a simplified pencil beam model.
    Ronga MG, Deut U, Bonfrate A, De Marzi L.
    Med Phys; 2023 Dec 21; 50(12):8009-8022. PubMed ID: 37730956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Influence of source parameters on large-field electron beam profiles calculated using Monte Carlo methods.
    Weinberg R, Antolak JA, Starkschall G, Kudchadker RJ, White RA, Hogstrom KR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan 07; 54(1):105-16. PubMed ID: 19075360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of GATE/GEANT4 with EGSnrc and MCNP for electron dose calculations at energies between 15 keV and 20 MeV.
    Maigne L, Perrot Y, Schaart DR, Donnarieix D, Breton V.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb 07; 56(3):811-27. PubMed ID: 21239846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Microdosimetry measurements characterizing the radiation fields of 300 MeV/u 12C and 185 MeV/u 7Li pencil beams stopping in water.
    Martino G, Durante M, Schardt D.
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun 21; 55(12):3441-9. PubMed ID: 20508316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Monte Carlo track structure for radiation biology and space applications.
    Nikjoo H, Uehara S, Khvostunov IG, Cucinotta FA, Wilson WE, Goodhead DT.
    Phys Med; 2001 Jun 21; 17 Suppl 1():38-44. PubMed ID: 11770535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Monte Carlo simulation and analysis of proton energy-deposition patterns in the Bragg peak.
    González-Muñoz G, Tilly N, Fernández-Varea JM, Ahnesjö A.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun 07; 53(11):2857-75. PubMed ID: 18460751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Validation of calculations for electrons modulated with conventional photon multileaf collimators.
    Klein EE, Vicic M, Ma CM, Low DA, Drzymala RE.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar 07; 53(5):1183-208. PubMed ID: 18296757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison and assessment of electron cross sections for Monte Carlo track structure codes.
    Uehara S, Nikjoo H, Goodhead DT.
    Radiat Res; 1999 Aug 07; 152(2):202-13. PubMed ID: 10409331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Auger effect in physical and biological research.
    Nikjoo H, Emfietzoglou D, Charlton DE.
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2008 Dec 07; 84(12):1011-26. PubMed ID: 19061125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 43.