These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


335 related items for PubMed ID: 18592141

  • 1. Congenital anomalies and variations of the bile and pancreatic ducts: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography findings, epidemiology and clinical significance.
    De Filippo M, Calabrese M, Quinto S, Rastelli A, Bertellini A, Martora R, Sverzellati N, Corradi D, Vitale M, Crialesi G, Sarli L, Roncoroni L, Garlaschi G, Zompatori M.
    Radiol Med; 2008 Sep; 113(6):841-59. PubMed ID: 18592141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Intrahepatic biliary duct branching patterns, cystic duct anomalies, and pancreas divisum in a tertiary referral center: A magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticographic study.
    Gupta A, Rai P, Singh V, Gupta RK, Saraswat VA.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2016 Sep; 35(5):379-384. PubMed ID: 27660206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and two-dimensional turbo spin-echo pulse sequences.
    Kim TK, Han JK, Kim SJ, Bae SH, Choi BI.
    Abdom Imaging; 1998 Sep; 23(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 9663276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical impact of 3-dimensional balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 T: prospective intraindividual comparison with 3-dimensional turbo-spin-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Itatani R, Namimoto T, Takaoka H, Katahira K, Noda S, Toyonari N, Yamashita Y.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015 Sep; 39(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25299796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Anatomic variations of the bile ducts: MRCP findings].
    Düşünceli E, Erden A, Erden I.
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2004 Dec; 10(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 15611920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3-D fast spin-echo and single-shot fast spin-echo radial slab MR cholangiopancreatography images in children.
    Chavhan GB, Almehdar A, Moineddin R, Gupta S, Babyn PS.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Sep; 43(9):1086-92. PubMed ID: 23508707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. GRASE Revisited: breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a Gradient and Spin Echo (GRASE) technique at 3T.
    Nam JG, Lee JM, Kang HJ, Lee SM, Kim E, Peeters JM, Yoon JH.
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3721-3728. PubMed ID: 29392471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences.
    Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T, Yamamoto H, Urata J, Takahashi M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1297-303. PubMed ID: 8633435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison between respiratory-triggered turbo spin echo and breath hold single-shot turbo spin echo sequences.
    Papanikolaou N, Karantanas AH, Heracleous E, Costa JC, Gourtsoyiannis N.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Nov; 17(9):1255-60. PubMed ID: 10576710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Visualization of pancreaticobiliary reflux in anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction by secretin-stimulated dynamic magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Hosoki T, Hasuike Y, Takeda Y, Michita T, Watanabe Y, Sakamori R, Tokuda Y, Yutani K, Sai C, Mitomo M.
    Acta Radiol; 2004 Jul; 45(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 15323388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique.
    Yamashita Y, Abe Y, Tang Y, Urata J, Sumi S, Takahashi M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1449-54. PubMed ID: 9168706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. MR cholangiopancreatography of pancreaticobiliary diseases: comparison of single-shot RARE and multislice HASTE sequences.
    Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, McEntee G, MacMathuna P, Stack JP, Murray JG.
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Nov; 55(11):866-73. PubMed ID: 11069743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. How reliable is MRCP with an SS-FSE sequence at 3.0 T: comparison between SS-FSE BH and 3D-FSE BH ASSET sequences.
    Lavdas E, Vlychou M, Arikidis N, Kapsalaki E, Roka V, Arvanitis DL, Fezoulidis I, Vassiou K.
    Clin Imaging; 2013 Nov; 37(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 23522790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Three-dimensional visualization technique compared with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for evaluation of anatomic variants of pediatric congenital choledochal cysts.
    Wang P, Gong Y, Lu S, Chen J.
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2021 Jun; 37(6):705-713. PubMed ID: 33507374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.