These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

856 related items for PubMed ID: 18595184

  • 1. The effects of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults with normal hearing.
    Uchida Y, Ando F, Shimokata H, Sugiura S, Ueda H, Nakashima T.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 18595184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.
    Ortmann AJ, Abdala C.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Apr; 37(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 27232070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.
    Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dorn PA.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):345-62. PubMed ID: 10466570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss.
    Gorga MP, Neely ST, Ohlrich B, Hoover B, Redner J, Peters J.
    Ear Hear; 1997 Dec; 18(6):440-55. PubMed ID: 9416447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP, Nelson K, Davis T, Dorn PA, Neely ST.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses.
    Dorn PA, Piskorski P, Gorga MP, Neely ST, Keefe DH.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):149-63. PubMed ID: 10229516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, Helt WJ, Wilmington D, Bratt GW, Konrad-Martin D.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.
    Wagner W, Plinkert PK, Vonthein R, Plontke SK.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18301908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM, Feeney MP, Gates GA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in middle-aged subjects with normal versus potentially presbyacusic high-frequency hearing loss.
    Nieschalk M, Hustert B, Stoll W.
    Audiology; 1998 Dec; 37(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 9547922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Distortion product otoacoustic emission response characteristics in older adults.
    Torre P, Cruickshanks KJ, Nondahl DM, Wiley TL.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 12598810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Relationships among standard and wideband measures of middle ear function and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Schairer KS, Morrison B, Szewczyk E, Fowler CG.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):253-64. PubMed ID: 21756841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans.
    Sun XM.
    Ear Hear; 2012 May; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses.
    Gorga MP, Neely ST, Bergman B, Beauchaine KL, Kaminski JR, Peters J, Jesteadt W.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2050-60. PubMed ID: 8473617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Changes in cochlear function related to acoustic stimulation of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential stimulation.
    Strömberg AK, Olofsson Å, Westin M, Duan M, Stenfelt S.
    Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():43-49. PubMed ID: 26724755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.
    Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dorn PA, Hoover BM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3275-84. PubMed ID: 12822800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) Growth in Aging Ears with Clinically Normal Behavioral Thresholds.
    Glavin CC, Siegel J, Dhar S.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):659-680. PubMed ID: 34591199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and tympanometric measurements in an adult population-based study.
    Uchida Y, Ando F, Nakata S, Ueda H, Nakashima T, Niino N, Shimokata H.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Dec; 33(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 16753276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 43.