These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

400 related items for PubMed ID: 18610925

  • 1. If the new pay system is fair, why are so many nurses on a downward slide?
    Waters A.
    Nurs Stand; ; 22(40):12-4. PubMed ID: 18610925
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pay heed.
    Duffin C.
    Nurs Stand; ; 17(8):12-3. PubMed ID: 12476799
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The case for fair pay.
    Errington S.
    Community Pract; 2010 Dec; 83(12):44-5. PubMed ID: 21214142
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. National ballots will test nurses'attitudes to talking industrial action over pay.
    Duffin C.
    Nurs Stand; 2010 Dec; 21(39):12-3. PubMed ID: 17569369
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Careers profile. Survey: tales by the nurses grim.
    Dix A.
    Health Serv J; 1996 Apr 25; 106(5500):38-9. PubMed ID: 10158260
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Pay and conditions.
    Dearmun A.
    Nurs Stand; 1996 Apr 25; 19(4):29. PubMed ID: 15521413
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Nurses are furious with government but job fears deter action, says Carter. Interview by Colin Parish.
    Carter P.
    Nurs Stand; 1996 Apr 25; 22(2):12. PubMed ID: 17944131
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Worth a packet?
    Lipley N.
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2004 Dec 25; 11(8):7. PubMed ID: 15630977
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Nurses' satisfaction with the Agenda for Change pay system.
    Hurst K.
    Nurs Stand; 2004 Dec 25; 21(41):14-5. PubMed ID: 17633334
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. 2009 nurse benefits survey.
    Fraleigh JM.
    RN; 2009 Sep 25; 72(9):34-7. PubMed ID: 19835233
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Undergoing a review of your matching outcome.
    Adkins C.
    Community Pract; 2005 Aug 25; 78(8):289-91. PubMed ID: 16114720
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A fair deal for tougher times.
    Gray J.
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Aug 25; 23(8):1. PubMed ID: 18986073
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Will agenda for change resolve the grading issue?
    O'Dowd A.
    Nurs Times; 2005 Aug 25; 99(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 12599903
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A common pay spine.
    Gale P.
    Br J Theatre Nurs; 1999 Dec 25; 9(12):579-83. PubMed ID: 10887854
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Counting the cost of the new pay deal.
    O'Dowd A.
    Nurs Times; 1999 Dec 25; 100(6):20-3. PubMed ID: 15000022
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Step change.
    Parish C.
    Nurs Stand; 1999 Dec 25; 20(29):14-5. PubMed ID: 16605225
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Lansley denies downgrading.
    Dowler C, Calkin S.
    Nurs Times; 1999 Dec 25; 107(41):2-3. PubMed ID: 23251975
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Nurses look forward to a better deal.
    O'Dowd A.
    Nurs Times; 1999 Dec 25; 100(35):12-3. PubMed ID: 15471261
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Job evaluation for clinical nursing jobs by implementing the NHS JE system.
    Kahya E, Oral N.
    J Nurs Manag; 2007 Oct 25; 15(7):740-8. PubMed ID: 17897151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Performance-related pay proposals to be explored at national meeting.
    Gillen S.
    Nurs Stand; 2007 Oct 25; 26(40):5. PubMed ID: 22848961
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.