These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

401 related items for PubMed ID: 18619859

  • 1. Has the 2004 revision of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grading system improved the reproducibility of the diagnosis and grading of cardiac transplant rejection?
    Yang HM, Lai CK, Gjertson DW, Baruch-Oren T, Ra SH, Watts W, Wallace WD, Shintaku P, Kobashigawa JA, Fishbein MC.
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2009; 18(4):198-204. PubMed ID: 18619859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A web-based pilot study of inter-pathologist reproducibility using the ISHLT 2004 working formulation for biopsy diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection: the European experience.
    Angelini A, Andersen CB, Bartoloni G, Black F, Bishop P, Doran H, Fedrigo M, Fries JW, Goddard M, Goebel H, Neil D, Leone O, Marzullo A, Ortmann M, Paraf F, Rotman S, Turhan N, Bruneval P, Frigo AC, Grigoletto F, Gasparetto A, Mencarelli R, Thiene G, Burke M.
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2011 Nov; 30(11):1214-20. PubMed ID: 21816625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Reproducibility of the acute rejection diagnosis in human cardiac allografts. The Stanford Classification and the International Grading System.
    Nielsen H, Sørensen FB, Nielsen B, Bagger JP, Thayssen P, Baandrup U.
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 1993 Nov; 12(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 8476896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Quantitative short-tandem repeat analysis of recipient-derived cells as an additional tool for diagnosing cardiac allograft rejection.
    Pichler M, Beckendorf J, Winter E, Kleinert R, Kniepeiss D, Hoefler G.
    Transplantation; 2010 Mar 27; 89(6):749-55. PubMed ID: 19997059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection.
    Stewart S, Winters GL, Fishbein MC, Tazelaar HD, Kobashigawa J, Abrams J, Andersen CB, Angelini A, Berry GJ, Burke MM, Demetris AJ, Hammond E, Itescu S, Marboe CC, McManus B, Reed EF, Reinsmoen NL, Rodriguez ER, Rose AG, Rose M, Suciu-Focia N, Zeevi A, Billingham ME.
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Nov 27; 24(11):1710-20. PubMed ID: 16297770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Nodular endocardial infiltrates (Quilty lesions) cause significant variability in diagnosis of ISHLT Grade 2 and 3A rejection in cardiac allograft recipients.
    Marboe CC, Billingham M, Eisen H, Deng MC, Baron H, Mehra M, Hunt S, Wohlgemuth J, Mahmood I, Prentice J, Berry G.
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Jul 27; 24(7 Suppl):S219-26. PubMed ID: 15993777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Correlation of endomyocardial biopsy findings with autopsy findings in human cardiac allografts.
    Nakhleh RE, Jones J, Goswitz JJ, Anderson EA, Titus J.
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 1992 Jul 27; 11(3 Pt 1):479-85. PubMed ID: 1610856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Concordance among pathologists in the second Cardiac Allograft Rejection Gene Expression Observational Study (CARGO II).
    Crespo-Leiro MG, Zuckermann A, Bara C, Mohacsi P, Schulz U, Boyle A, Ross HJ, Parameshwar J, Zakliczyński M, Fiocchi R, Stypmann J, Hoefer D, Lehmkuhl H, Deng MC, Leprince P, Berry G, Marboe CC, Stewart S, Tazelaar HD, Baron HM, Coleman IC, Vanhaecke J.
    Transplantation; 2012 Dec 15; 94(11):1172-7. PubMed ID: 23222738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.