These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

506 related items for PubMed ID: 18620841

  • 21. Estimating a summarized odds ratio whilst eliminating publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Sugita M, Kanamori M, Izuno T, Miyakawa M.
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1992 Oct; 22(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 1469797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Publication bias in papers presented to the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting.
    Harris IA, Mourad MS, Kadir A, Solomon MJ, Young JM.
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jun; 76(6):427-31. PubMed ID: 16768761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Meta-analysis as a guide to clinical practice.
    Swales JD.
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1993 Dec; 11(5):S59-63. PubMed ID: 8158435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Positive reasons for publishing negative findings.
    Connor JT.
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Sep; 103(9):2181-3. PubMed ID: 18671812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
    Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Benefits and risks of adjunctive inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis.
    Sobieraj DM, White CM, Coleman CI.
    Clin Ther; 2008 Aug; 30(8):1416-25. PubMed ID: 18803985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK.
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Meta-analysis: Methods, strengths, weaknesses, and political uses.
    Noble JH.
    J Lab Clin Med; 2006 Jan; 147(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 16443000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J, Olkin I.
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul 15; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. What you see depends on where you're looking and how you look at it: publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
    Howland RH.
    J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2011 Aug 15; 49(8):13-5. PubMed ID: 21766733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ, Brannick MT.
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar 15; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
    Saveleva E, Selinski S.
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008 Mar 15; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Selective reporting of positive outcomes in randomised trials--secondary publication.. A comparison of protocols with published reports].
    Hróbjartsson A, Chan AW, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Aug 22; 167(34):3189-91. PubMed ID: 16117920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
    Vavken P, Dorotka R.
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar 22; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Excess significance bias in the literature on brain volume abnormalities.
    Ioannidis JP.
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2011 Aug 22; 68(8):773-80. PubMed ID: 21464342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F, Wetterslev J, Gluud C, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ.
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar 22; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Meta-analyses triggered by previous (false-)significant findings: problems and solutions.
    Schuit E, Roes KC, Mol BW, Kwee A, Moons KG, Groenwold RH.
    Syst Rev; 2015 Apr 25; 4():57. PubMed ID: 25908184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. How much of the data published in observational studies of the association between diet and prostate or bladder cancer is usable for meta-analysis?
    Bekkering GE, Harris RJ, Thomas S, Mayer AM, Beynon R, Ness AR, Harbord RM, Bain C, Smith GD, Sterne JA.
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 May 01; 167(9):1017-26. PubMed ID: 18403406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Confidence intervals and P-values for meta-analysis with publication bias.
    Henmi M, Copas JB, Eguchi S.
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun 01; 63(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17688500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A bound for publication bias based on the fraction of unpublished studies.
    Copas J, Jackson D.
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar 01; 60(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 15032784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.