These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
186 related items for PubMed ID: 18623125
1. Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments. Mayo S, Acevedo D, Quiñones-Torrelo C, Canós I, Sancho M. J Clin Lab Anal; 2008; 22(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 18623125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting. Shayanfar N, Tobler U, von Eckardstein A, Bestmann L. Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 17635081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of microscopic review criteria by comparison urine flow cytometer, strip and manual microscopic examination. Xiang D, Cong Y, Wang C, Yue J, Ma X, Lu Y, Liu P, Ma J. Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):979-85. PubMed ID: 23163114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Automated cobas u 701 Urine Microscopy and UF-1000i Flow Cytometry Systems and Manual Microscopy in the Examination of Urine Sediments. Lee W, Ha JS, Ryoo NH. J Clin Lab Anal; 2016 Sep; 30(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 26842372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sysmex UF-5000 Automatic Urine Sediment Analyzer Can Improve the Accuracy of Epithelial Cell Detection. Chen Y, Zhang Z, Lin Z, Wu Y, Zhao Y, Wang G, Jing J. Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2021 Jul; 51(4):562-569. PubMed ID: 34452897 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Urine particles analysis: performance evaluation of Sysmex UF-1000i and comparison among urine flow cytometer, dipstick, and visual microscopic examination. Jiang T, Chen P, Ouyang J, Zhang S, Cai D. Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2011 Feb; 71(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 21091139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of two automated urine sediment analyzers with manual phase-contrast microscopy. Enko D, Stelzer I, Böckl M, Derler B, Schnedl WJ, Anderssohn P, Meinitzer A, Herrmann M. Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Jan 28; 58(2):268-273. PubMed ID: 31605578 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer]. Park J, Kim J. Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Aug 28; 28(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18728375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The standardization of the report for urine cell counting-A converting factor for Sysmex UF-1000i. Wang L, Wang H, Zhao C, Chen C. J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 May 28; 33(4):e22857. PubMed ID: 30916401 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of five automated urine sediment analyzers with manual microscopy for accurate identification of urine sediment. Cho J, Oh KJ, Jeon BC, Lee SG, Kim JH. Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Oct 25; 57(11):1744-1753. PubMed ID: 31280239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Safely reducing manual urine microscopy analyses by combining urine flow cytometer and strip results. Roggeman S, Zaman Z. Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Dec 25; 116(6):872-8. PubMed ID: 11764076 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]