These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
342 related items for PubMed ID: 18626349
1. A head-to-head comparison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function? Selber JC, Samra F, Bristol M, Sonnad SS, Vega S, Wu L, Serletti JM. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Aug; 122(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 18626349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction. Wan DC, Tseng CY, Anderson-Dam J, Dalio AL, Crisera CA, Festekjian JH. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps. Chevray PM. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Lee KT, Mun GH. Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction. Selber JC, Fosnot J, Nelson J, Goldstein J, Bergey M, Sonnad S, Serletti JM. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Nov; 126(5):1438-1453. PubMed ID: 21042100 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Chang DW, Wang B, Robb GL, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Langstein HN, Kroll SS. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Apr; 105(5):1640-8. PubMed ID: 10809092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Wu LC, Bajaj A, Chang DW, Chevray PM. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Sep; 122(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 18766032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, Watson JP, DaLio AL, Crisera CA. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):1519-1526. PubMed ID: 18453973 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. unilateral reconstruction. Selber JC, Nelson J, Fosnot J, Goldstein J, Bergey M, Sonnad SS, Serletti JM. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1142-1153. PubMed ID: 20885239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficacy of bilateral lower abdominal free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Beahm EK, Walton RL. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Jul; 120(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 17572543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Baumann DP, Lin HY, Chevray PM. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 May; 125(5):1335-1341. PubMed ID: 20440154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Perfusion-related complications are similar for DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps harvested on medial or lateral deep inferior epigastric Artery branch perforators for breast reconstruction. Garvey PB, Salavati S, Feng L, Butler CE. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Dec; 128(6):581e-589e. PubMed ID: 22094755 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction. Wang XL, Liu LB, Song FM, Wang QY. Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Aug; 38(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 24902911 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Significance of abdominal wall CT-angiography in planning DIEA perforator flaps, TRAM flaps and SIEA flaps]. Fansa H, Schirmer S, Frerichs O, Gehl HB. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2011 Apr; 43(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 20821365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Muscle sparing-2 transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: a comparison with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Takeishi M, Fujimoto M, Ishida K, Makino Y. Microsurgery; 2008 May; 28(8):650-5. PubMed ID: 18844226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. 500 Consecutive patients with free TRAM flap breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's experience. Vega S, Smartt JM, Jiang S, Selber JC, Brooks CJM, Herrera HR, Serletti JM. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Aug; 122(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 18626347 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. DIEP flaps in women with abdominal scars: are complication rates affected? Parrett BM, Caterson SA, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):1527-1531. PubMed ID: 18453974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, Zhang H, Nosrati N, Robb GL, Chang DW. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Dec; 132(6):1383-1391. PubMed ID: 24005365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]