These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1200 related items for PubMed ID: 18631335

  • 1. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I, Patsea E, Chatzimichali K, Skouriotis S, Chalkidou S, Amariotakis G, Papakonstadinou D, Theodossiadis G, Amariotakis A, Georgopoulos G.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M, Halverson KD, Qualls C.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G.
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
    Bochmann F, Kaufmann C, Becht C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Apr; 226(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 19384775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF.
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes].
    Viestenz A, Langenbucher A, Viestenz A.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Oct; 223(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17063423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A, Loge K, Schroeder B, Füllhas MO, Wiegand W.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
    Lanza M, Borrelli M, De Bernardo M, Filosa ML, Rosa N.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y, Hirose N, Kubota T, Tawara A.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude].
    Colás-Tomás T, Prieto-Del Cura M, Villafruela-Güemes I, Clariana-Martín A, Valdivia-Pérez A.
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Ku JY, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP, Gamble GD, McGhee CN.
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A, Crabb DP, Spratt A, Garway-Heath DF.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
    Umurhan Akkan JC, Akkan F, Sezgin Akcay BI, Ayintap E, Tuncer K.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Wang J, Cayer MM, Descovich D, Kamdeu-Fansi A, Harasymowycz PJ, Li G, Lesk MR.
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Brusini P.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
    Barleon L, Hoffmann EM, Berres M, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
    Ko YC, Liu CJ, Hsu WM.
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 60.