These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


700 related items for PubMed ID: 18633324

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
    Botros A, Psarros C.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K, Holden L, Skinner M, Arcaroli J, Whitford L, Law MA, Nel E.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting.
    Botros A, Psarros C.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 20124902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.
    Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Hay-McCutcheon MJ, Robinson BK, Nourski KV, Jeng FC.
    Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):75-86. PubMed ID: 15567605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. ECAP spread of excitation with virtual channels and physical electrodes.
    Hughes ML, Stille LJ, Baudhuin JL, Goehring JL.
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():93-103. PubMed ID: 24095669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
    Yang H, Tang J, Cao K, Zhu X, Wang Y, Pan T.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical results of AutoNRT, a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants.
    van Dijk B, Botros AM, Battmer RD, Begall K, Dillier N, Hey M, Lai WK, Lenarz T, Laszig R, Morsnowski A, Müller-Deile J, Psarros C, Shallop J, Weber B, Wesarg T, Zarowski A, Offeciers E.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 17609616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H, Truy E, Charasse B, Boutitie F, Chanal JM, Cochard N, Piron JP, Ribas S, Deguine O, Fraysse B, Mondain M, Uziel A, Collet L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldán C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.