These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

501 related items for PubMed ID: 18640290

  • 1. Multiple pathways cooperate to facilitate DNA replication fork progression through alkylated DNA.
    Vázquez MV, Rojas V, Tercero JA.
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2008 Oct 01; 7(10):1693-704. PubMed ID: 18640290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Methods to study replication fork collapse in budding yeast.
    Liberi G, Cotta-Ramusino C, Lopes M, Sogo J, Conti C, Bensimon A, Foiani M.
    Methods Enzymol; 2006 Oct 01; 409():442-62. PubMed ID: 16793417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.
    Tourrière H, Pasero P.
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul 01; 6(7):900-13. PubMed ID: 17379579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint.
    Meister P, Taddei A, Vernis L, Poidevin M, Gasser SM, Baldacci G.
    J Cell Biol; 2005 Feb 14; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 15716375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.
    Lambert S, Carr AM.
    Biochimie; 2005 Jul 14; 87(7):591-602. PubMed ID: 15989976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The DNA damage response during DNA replication.
    Branzei D, Foiani M.
    Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2005 Dec 14; 17(6):568-75. PubMed ID: 16226452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex.
    Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Bando M, Noguchi H, Tanaka H, Ashikari T, Sugimoto K, Shirahige K.
    Nature; 2003 Aug 28; 424(6952):1078-83. PubMed ID: 12944972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Exploring the roles of Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 at perturbed replication forks.
    Osman F, Whitby MC.
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul 01; 6(7):1004-17. PubMed ID: 17409028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The budding yeast protein Chl1p is required to preserve genome integrity upon DNA damage in S-phase.
    Laha S, Das SP, Hajra S, Sau S, Sinha P.
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jul 01; 34(20):5880-91. PubMed ID: 17062629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Limiting amounts of budding yeast Rad53 S-phase checkpoint activity results in increased resistance to DNA alkylation damage.
    Cordón-Preciado V, Ufano S, Bueno A.
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jul 01; 34(20):5852-62. PubMed ID: 17062626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork.
    Andreassen PR, Ho GP, D'Andrea AD.
    Carcinogenesis; 2006 May 01; 27(5):883-92. PubMed ID: 16490739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The analysis of S. cerevisiae cells deleted for mitotic cyclin Clb2 reveals a novel requirement of Sgs1 DNA helicase and Exonuclease 1 when replication forks break in the presence of alkylation damage.
    Signon L, Simon MN.
    Mutat Res; 2014 Nov 01; 769():80-92. PubMed ID: 25771727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Pol32 is required for Pol zeta-dependent translesion synthesis and prevents double-strand breaks at the replication fork.
    Hanna M, Ball LG, Tong AH, Boone C, Xiao W.
    Mutat Res; 2007 Dec 01; 625(1-2):164-76. PubMed ID: 17681555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.